Metatroy's Blog

March 28, 2013

Letter to LIPA– Pete Lude and email back

Filed under: Laser Video Projector — Tags: , , , , , , , — metatroy @ 2:48 pm

Steps Forward in Handling Digital Cinema Laser Projector Patent Infringements

By Diane Troyer (Inventor) – MetaZtron (MZT) is used in this document instead of Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV).

One year ago (Feb. 2012) I sent a letter to LIPA Consortium Chairman Peter Lude’. (LIPA: Laser Illuminated Projector Association). I have copied the letter that was buried in my metatroy blog and it is being revived for evaluation. There is the answer back from a LIPA representative included. http://lipainfo.org/

So far Sony, NEC, Christies, and Kodak, IMAX and Barco have each spent millions on R&D to build digital cinema laser projectors at great expense. They are demonstrating their prototypes but have not placed them in the market. Sony was to place their Digital Cinema laser projectors on sale in July 2012, but canceled. RED also has built a projector.

Does IMAX still have a deal with BARCO: http://www.laserfocusworld.com/news/2012/02/10/imax-teams-with-barco-to-co-develop-laser-projection-technology.html

Christies states they are almost ready to start installations. http://www.christiedigital.co.uk/emea/cinema/cinema-solutions-case-studies/christie-videos/Pages/christie-debuts-full-length-laser-projection-video.aspx

LIPA Consortium for Digital Cinema laser projector companies has changed their focus. LIPA is not doing a big production at NAB this year (2013). After the LIPA consortium received the Troyer letter, they have stopped claiming being the first to deliver the new laser innovation.

Email to LIPA Lude Troyer Laser ZTV 412

Filed under: Laser Video Projector — Tags: Laser, LIP, LIPA, Lude’, Metatron, Metatroy, Red, Troyer, Z Tron, Z*Tron Vision, ZTV — metatroy @ 6:42 pm

Note: Lude’ is Chairman at LIPA – Laser Illuminated Projector Association and President at SMPTE and Senior VP at Sony Electronics .

We had a phone conversation about laser projection and how to create more eye safe laser images. I suggested to Pete Lude’ to read slide share: Troyer Laser Patent Portfolio (claims for Feb. 14, 2012 patent). http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/troyer-patent-portfolio-2012

Also suggested is slide share Troyer 411: http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/troyer-outline-411

Laser Opportunity power point for John Deere. http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/laser-projector-opportunity-metaztron-vision

(The below memo has been edited for more clarity).

Pete Lude’ Memo—President/ CEO of LIPA consortium (Feb. 2012)

Thank you for sharing a conversation about laser projection and my patents. Congratulations on pushing the envelope by setting up LIPA laser projector consortium and caring about laser projectors. You suggest that we share with the industry the MetaZtron Vision (MZTV) laser projector process again? Many in the studios including Sony head of entertainment, Chris Cookson when he was at Warner (2002) attended the Metatron Inc. (California 1992 -2002) demonstrations from 1992 – 2003.  From 1992 – 1997 we showed the upgraded TRW laser projectors. From late 1999 to 2003 we demonstrated the Troyer patented new approach. We were OEM to JVC and used their base reflective light valve ILA projector.

It has been verified that the Troyer patented process for laser digital imaging works best, ascertained after much R&D and demonstrating prototypes for expert evaluators. It has also been established by patent experts that the LIPA consortium companies building laser projectors are following the Troyer patented formula for their architecture designs.

What do you as the LIPA chairman feel is a way to fast track this process and so the industry finally is delivered the KISS (keep it simple streamlined) way of presenting the best image? You stated that we should present MetaZtron in what forum?

Review of Our Phone Conversation (Troyer and Pete Lude as Chairman of LIPA):

It was suggested that you read the Troyer Patent Portfolio on Diane Troyer’s slide share. Explained in the paper is that the Troyer 2001 patent claims cover using a liquid crystal light valve. The Troyer US 2006 and 2012 patent and the Troyer Canadian patent claims broaden to reflective light valve, counting DLP, LCoS, MEMS, LED, etc.

The Kodak demonstration laser projector used the Troyer patented approach with the DLP reflective light valves. Troyer Patent Portfolio.

I did not know IMAX had made a deal with BARCO when we talked. I would have liked to discuss that further. We discussed the fact that IMAX has stated through press releases and CEO interviews that they have the rights to laser digital domes through the purchase of the Kodak patents. According to the research done by a hired expert in evaluating the Kodak patents, Kodak does not have patents that cover big screen domes. I was asked by the patent evaluator to also study the Kodak patents and claims. I was unable to locate Kodak patent claims covering their demonstration prototype – lasers addressed to reflective light valve (DLP) producing full color spectrum images (red 635 nm or above) with collimation and polarization in the laser images retained to the screen (great 3D is not possible without polarized images).

Concerning laser projection, Kodak has a patent portfolio based on a grated light valve method. Grated Light Valves have been found not to be a light efficient method, producing dull images on the screen. The Silicon Light Machine (SLM) was also a grated light valve. Sony paid $30 million for entertainment rights to use the SLM. Evans & Sutherland paid $10 million for planetariums, simulation and domes rights. Rockwell Collins purchased the Evans & Sutherland SLM rights for simulation ($71.5 M) also receiving buildings and infrastructure. This purchase was during the time that Rockwell Collins and Metatron Zone Management LLC, an Iowa company had signed NDA and Rockwell Collins was gathering information about Troyer’s patented laser projection. The SLM grated light valve laser projectors has since been mothballed due to the dull images and the corruption of collimation and polarization in the laser images—meaning image artifacts, bad 3D and the images do not have the ability to adjust to curved screens in real time.

Thus Kodak did not use their patented grating light valve approach for their prototype laser projector demonstration. Kodak used design architecture that had been proven to work for best 3D imaging: the Troyer patented approach directing expanded laser beams to a reflective light valve (DLP, LCoS, MEMS, OLED, etc.) producing more eye safe full spectrum colored images and keeping the laser inherent attributes for best 3D polarization in the image to the screen.

Kodak attorneys are quite aware of patent law and lawsuits and licensing. Kodak litigated against Apple and Rim for infringement on their camera and phone patents. It has been shown that the Kodak IP attorneys warned the Kodak representatives that during their Kodak laser projector prototype demonstrations that they were not to claim patent coverage for their prototype nor should they suggest they are licensing the prototype laser projector. They were to promote the licensing/ selling of the Kodak optic path design for lasers addressed to a reflective light valve.

Kodak representative followed this mandate. In the Kodak statements, literature, press releases, interviews and discussion with those who attended the private demonstrations, Kodak did not suggest that they had patents covering their demonstration model, nor did they state they were selling licenses to their demonstration projector. The Kodak literature and web sites stated Kodak was selling their optic designs for the laser projector.

Yes, Kodak has patents on certain adjustments to the basic laser projector optic layouts, such as the optic path that was shown in the Troyer patent description and drawings. Kodak has patents on an optic they add, which they state reduces the speckle in the optic path. It is not known if that optic was part of their optical design in the demonstration model. The fact that Kodak has an optic patent does not in any way reduce the fact that the basic laser projector architecture that LIPA consortium is now suggesting to be used by the industry to assemble laser projectors is the Troyer patented process.

IMAX Press and IMAX CEO Interviews: Claim Patent Solution for Laser projection/ Domes

On October 17, 2011 the IMAX CEO announced that they controlled large screen laser projection with the purchase of certain Kodak patents.  He stated that IMAX would sub-license the patents for smaller models. The CEO suggested that the high end home theater laser projector could be sold for $2 million in a Barclay interview. The IMAX CEO statements and the many press releases about Kodak patents being solution for digital domes and flat screens were impetus for the IMAX stock to go higher. http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1222364361001/imax-ceo-on-laser-projection-patents-deal-with-kodak/

“IMAX’s licensing of Kodak’s revolutionary laser projection technology and patents will enable IMAX, for the first time ever, to deliver the highest-quality digital content available to IMAX® film-based screens larger than 80 feet and to dome theatres. This technology also will allow IMAX to distribute content with greater efficiency to the company’s global theatre network.” http://newsle.com/article/0/42836538/

IMAX does not have patent coverage for domes from Kodak:  To save great time and expense, some responsible entity should ask the IMAX CEO or Kodak’s  representative, Kim Snyder, what patents IMAX has licensed that cover laser projection with a reflective light valve for big dome or flat screens? For that matter, now that IMAX is partnering with Barco, Barco better have the answers or they are putting themselves in the path of infringement if they use the Troyer patented KISS (streamlined) approach for best image.

It is apparent that Sony (LCoS) and NEC, BARCO, Kodak, IMAX, and Christies (DLP) are all using the same formula: lasers directed to a reflective light valve with full spectrum colored images (red 635 nm or over). Note: RED laser projector also is using the Troyer same patented approach with LCoS light valve.

Purpose for Non-Profit LIPA? Marketing for their Consortium Members ($25,000 fee). Why is the LIPA non-profit consortium stating that they are demonstrating full spectrum color laser images for the first time? Experts from almost all these companies building laser projectors have attended the Troyer laser demonstrations in California in 1999- 2003 (documented). Should we have our representative bring this situation up with LIPA? Is LIPA a forum set up as a front for another phase of suppression of the Troyer patented laser projectors? Will the industry go through another ten years of contentious battling while audiences wait for great 3D dome images with bright filmic colors?

Zuddite (modern Luddite) Attacks: It can be shown through the long history between IMAX and Troyer that IMAX corporate is very aware of the Troyer patents and has attended dome and lab demonstrations of the Troyer prototypes, etc. It is thus assumed that the IMAX CEO is very aware of the Troyer patented laser projector. In fact it can be shown through documented evidence that IMAX corporate with strategic collusion companies has made a calculated effort to thwart Metatron Inc. and Metatron Zone Management and Troyer from delivering the Troyer patented projectors to clients.

Imax Press Conference October 17, 2011 is Reminiscent of the Press Conference May 2003:

The IMAX CEO accompanied by James Cameron and Phillip Anschutz gave a press conference in May 2003 stating that IMAX was ready to deliver and install digital cinema projectors (laser) in IMAX screens (flat screens and domes). The IMAX stock shot up and the Wasserstein Limited Partners sold their preferred stock for over $800 million.

Is it legal to provide misinformation to stock holders? Was it legal in 2003 for the IMAX CEO to represent they had digital projectors for flat screens and domes? Is it legal today to state they have patent coverage for domes, when they know they do not?

Did IMAX corporate represent to Cameron and Anschutz that they had finally gotten control of the Metatron technology? This was soon after the 10 assembled JVC projectors for waiting clients who wanted laser projectors were stolen. Among the clients: Famous Players for 8 Canadian large screen theaters, 40 theaters owned by European sister theater company– Universal Vivendi, Raytheon (Williams Air Force Base—simulation), Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish; etc. Lexel Laser had the 30 lasers assembled for the ten projectors. The JVC projector theft ruined Lexel Lasers – no need for lasers without projectors. Lexel was taken over by the collusion group for pennies on the $.

Patents protected Troyer from complete demise. Troyer will preach the importance of patents and the patent developer/ inventor receiving fair return for the years of time and expense. The Troyer patents and the ultimate survival from the Zuddites (modern Luddites) attack on Troyer is an example of how patents can protect a technology and the inventor. It is also an example of how innovation from independent inventors is often suppressed in this country.

Troyer Team Mission: Introduce auto dimensional HIVE platforms globally, through an infrastructure we help support.

We are now transitioning from flat screen 2D imaging to dimensional vistas. MetaZTron (MZT) is the missing platform tool for the transformation.

‘THIS IS THE TIME — SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY

Respectfully,

Diane Troyer

Troyer Note: Peter Lude’ had asked me to talk to the LIPA group in our phone conversation prior to this letter. After he got this email (letter), I received the email below.

Letter from LIPA

From: Michael Ciesinski <michael.ciesinski@flextech.org>

Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:22 PM

Subject: E-mail and Memo to P. Lude’/LIPA

To: metatronvision@gmail.com

Cc: “Lude’, Peter” Peter.Lude@am.sony.com

Ms. Diane Troyer

Metatron Zone LLC

Dear Ms. Troyer:

Peter Lude’ of Sony forwarded to me your e-mail dated February 14, 2012 concerning the Troyer patent portfolio. We at the Laser Illuminated Projector Association (LIPA) thank you for your interest in our organization.

However, LIPA is a not-for-profit organization which is not authorized to engage in market promotional activities for any single party, nor is it authorized to consider the patent positions of our members or others in the industry. These activities are simply outside of our charter.

If you wish to present your views on your patent portfolio, you can contact LIPA members directly. However, please be advised that LIPA will have no ability to act on any of the issues which concern your patent portfolio.

I regret that we could not be of assistance to you in this matter.

Sincerely,

Michael Ciesinski

LIPA Managing Director

CEO/ FlexTech Alliance

3081 Zanker Road

San Jose, California USA 95134

Tel. 1-408-577-1300

www.flextech.org

This e-mail message is confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It is not to be forwarded without permission of the sender. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer or mobile device.

This is a copy of a section from the LIPA Consortium pamphlet 2012

  • Communications: chaired by Rich Reames of Sony – Responsible for LIPA’s communications outreach
  • Regulatory Technology Issues: chaired by Dave Schnuelle of Dolby – Responsible for identifying and resolving technical issues impeding commercialization of laser illuminated projectors
  • Regulatory Business Issues: chaired by Pete Lude’ of Sony – responsible for identifying and resolving business issues and ensuring the overall industry’s path to commercialization of laser illuminated projectors

Troyer Journal Notes at NAB April 2012

It seems that my letter to LIPA had a great effect. I ran into David Schnuelle from Dolby in front of the RED Laser Projector booth. He is now a LIPA board member. (Chaired by Dave Schnuelle of Dolby – Responsible for identifying and resolving technical issues impeding commercialization of laser illuminated projectors).

Schnuelle viewed the MetaZtron projector at the IVC lab (International Video Convergence) in Burbank in 2002. I asked him if he remembered accompanying Ken Holland, owner of IVC, when Holland started screaming at my engineer and me: “You will not get by with this!” – shaking his fist at us.  We were getting the laser projector demonstration set up for the Warner technology group (Chris Cookson a member of the Warner group attending – note: Cookson is now head of digital cinema at Sony).

Schnuelle looked at me shocked, because maybe he had not make the connection – but what other woman has been shouting and proving that the laser video projector is the solution for digital cinema for years? Yes, he was with Ken Holland, owner of IVC, when Holland stood at our lab door at IVC screaming at us.

International Video Convergence was where Star Wars film was transferred to digital and prepared for the digital cinema competition between the JVC Hughes and the DLP (Texas Instrument) arc lamp projectors. Thus it was a natural lab space to demonstrate to the industry a new laser projection technology.

The IVC post house was the Warner lab for transferring Warner film to DVD. One of Ken Holland’s main income producers was the color theater where they pushed digital color so the digital cinema arc lamp presentations would be more like film. When viewers saw the MetaZtron laser projector images, they realized that it was possible for a digital image to have the filmic full color spectrum and good blacks (contrast) –without the need of a color lab to enhance the digital colors.

Howard Lukk was head engineer and also head of technology on the Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI). After seeing the MetaZtron Laser Projector’s images, Howard Lukk placed a DCI mandate for full color spectrum images for digital cinema. Today the DCI mandate is still not met with arc lamp digital projection. Only laser images have full color spectrum as long as the red lasers are 635 nm or above to mix to achieve the best whites and blacks.  This color mixture is one of Troyer’s main claims in her patents.

Ken Holland was participant in the collusion group who made sure that the Troyer patented projector did not make it to the clients. The collusion group evidently felt that it would be too dangerous for the MetaZtron projector to be installed in a venue.  One main focus was to stop the demonstration model from being installed in the Griffith Park Planetarium, closed for refurbish. The MetaZtron images would cause a lot of publicity and crash the competitor’s stocks. MetaZtron would bring on a whole new transformation to the industry. The collusion group would stop the installations of MetaZtron. Planned was to take over the technology, if possible, using “questionable” means.

Some of the waiting customers: Famous Players, Canada: 8 big screens; Sister European Company: 40 (plus) projectors (note: these clients had seen a demonstration on the IMAX dome at the Tech Museum in San Jose—arranged by Roy Disney and Paul Holliman).  William’s Air Force Base (Raytheon) for  “out of window pilot training” and Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish.

The demonstration laser projector was to be moved from IVC (Burbank) to be installed in the Hollywood Griffith Park Planetarium. The planned opening show was to be dimensional space images captured by NASA and Jet Propulsion Lab stereo cameras on the shuttles. These images would be synced with the University of Iowa’s space shuttle’s recordings. Dr. Donald Gurnett from the Van Allen physics lab at the University of Iowa built the shuttle recorders (quadraphonic) and captured the sounds.

The MetaZtron Laser Projector was the only vehicle able to show dimensional vivid space images on the Planetarium dome.  The MetaZtron images adjust automatically saving a lot of time and expense. Today with flat screen arc lamp digital projectors, costly time consuming “Projection mapping” is used for domes creating computer images so they will be in focus on curved surfaces.

Right before the move to Griffith Park Planetarium, the MetaZtron Projector was stolen from the secure IVC lab with the lasers, tools and 40 expensive custom made polarizing cubes ($600 each) coded for red, green, and blue. These custom made PBS big cubes were part of the optic train for the 10 JVC projector bases being built for clients. IVC was the old Lockheed Skunk Works- so was probably the most secure building in Burbank so it was obvious that the theft was an inside job.

A Burbank police report was made about the stolen projector and equipment. There was an investigation by the FBI. Because of the theft of the Troyer laser projector, Griffith Park had to take an alternative course, installing the Evans & Sutherland dull and very expensive laser projectors. The planned content was never produced. Audiences still wait for immersive vivid space planetarium images.

The 10 JVC projectors were being assembled and tested at the JVC  lab in Southern, California by Rod Sterling and Dr. Bill Bleha. Eight projectors were to go to Famous Players for their big screens for digital Cinerama.  The projectors had to be set up right for best images. Laser images are sensitive and more vivid so artifacts are more easily seen.  One projector was to go to Wright Patterson Air Force Base to begin working in pilot simulation.

These projectors were picked up by truck and disappeared and have never been recovered. Lexel Lasers had the 30 lasers ready to be installed.  Thus they were compromised and taken over by the collusion partners for pennies.

Attack of the Zuddites (modern Luddites):  This is the story of a suppressed technology and is found under other copy and will be released soon.  In this case the Troyer patented technology had to wait for the perfect storm. The Zuddites are shipwrecked and the technology is finally available for the waiting audiences.  The vendors are ready and off the shelf. The gamers will probably be the first responders. The Air Force still waits for the MetaZtron tool kit for best immersive battle and disaster training.  Home theaters will be Z*Rama— dimensional Cinerama.

Professor Christensen’s definition of disruptive technology: “An innovation that is disruptive allows a whole new population of consumers access to a product or service that was historically only accessible to consumers with a lot of money or a lot of skill.”

Discussion with David Schnuelle at NAB 2012

NAB: Dave Schnuelle was the LIPA person who was the communicator —whether he wanted to be or not. He informed me he had read the letter sent to Lude’. He told me that the LIPA members were not infringing because they are flooding the reflective light valve instead of scanning. I informed Schnuelle that my patent claims cover lasers addressed to the light valve and are not limited to scanning. I did tell him that flooding is not going to work—that there are many problems with flooding—mainly not having control over artifacts and low contrast with light bleeding into the blacks.

Parallel Projection: The laser attributes mean that the expanded polarized coherent collimated beam can be directed. Ambient light like the sun scatters so can be flooded, not directed like lasers. Parallel Projection combines streams of laser beams. Kodak and Barco both have patents based on forms of how to direct laser light to a reflective light valves. The parallel laser lines are combined into a flood. That might work if the image was not constantly static (too hot). It is difficult to provide even light flow without artifacts in the images. Also with such a flood the contrast is reduced.

Barco and Kodak both have leap frog patents for addressing laser light to a reflective light valve. A leap frog patent adds a specific addition to a patent’s broader claim that has already been issued. Parallel projection is a specific way to address lasers to the reflective light valve. The Troyer patent claims are broad in how the laser is addressed to the light valve. I suggested that the LIPA group read my claims and patents (Troyer Patent Portfolio). Also I offered to provide the LIPA members a specific claims chart that compares the Troyer patent claims to the Kodak, IMAX, BARCO, Sony and Christies laser projector reflective light valve prototype configurations.

I informed Dave Schnuelle that I am not planning on suing LIPA, but that my representatives are upset that LIPA is made up of companies whose representatives have attended the MetaZtron (Metatron) demonstrations, received white papers, and are now marketing my patented process through LIPA, stating this is their newly discovered approach. Patents are for the purpose of protecting the inventor who spent the years of R&D and a great deal of money and discovered the innovation. For instance just the Canadian patent granted January 15, 2013 has cost near $50,000—mainly in years of patent fees.

I also shared I had just seen the RED laser projector 3D demonstration and the images had given me a splitting headache. I did not know if I had preprogrammed myself for a headache –but there was an ache right above my eyes behind my forehead. Maybe it was because I had peered so intently at the images to see if there was blurring in the fast movement. I had just discovered that the person who set the Red laser projector was an engineer who had worked for Metatron Inc. for a few weeks. Thus I know he does not have patents for his designed process: lasers addressed to a reflective light valve (LCoS) with the red 635 nm or above.

Snhnuelle is in charge of Dolby’s new technologies. They were showing at NAB 2012 an auto stereo display that they had developed with Phillips. Dolby and Sony are both companies that lost a lot of money last year and are reviving under new management.

CASEY STACK: I had exchanged emails with Casey Stack before NAB 2012. He was the expert on laser FDA mandates. He was to be a speaker on the LIPA forum at NAB. I informed him that we had worked with FDA when the Troyer team was upgrading the TRW laser projectors. One of the main reasons for the KISS (streamlined) Troyer patented process for laser projection was a more eye safe method by expanding the laser beams and reflecting the expanded beam (scanning line) off the reflective light valve. I was sharing so Stack could provide my answers to the LIPA members. Asking and answering questions is a good method to cut through to the chase. Also it is a way of KISS—keep it simple—streamline so there is not any more time wasted delivering this wonderful technology to the audiences.

Another year and NAB 2013:  The LIPA consortium members only communication has been through the LIPA the letter that was received. If they really care about delivering laser projection, it seems as if they would want to solve the obvious problems. We have been told by litigation attorneys and patent trolls and patent brokers that in this kind of situation, sometimes the only method is lawsuits, otherwise the infringing groups do not take the inventor seriously.   If the infringer knows they are infringing the court awards the inventor 3 times more reward.    

Diane Troyer

Metatron Zone LLC

Office: 319-512-1009 Cell: 818-795-2407

metatroy@outlook.com
metatronvision@gmail.com

Metatroy Diane’s Twitter

Metatroy slide share (check this out)

MetaZtron Vision holographic Z-depth-factor

MetaZtron Vision Themed Entertainment (see the Sprite)

Troyer Patent Portfolio see new patent claims Feb. 14, 2012 Projector Camera full spectrum dimensional (3D) images

http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/troyer-outline-411

http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/hive-zelf-holograph-immersive-virtual-laser-meta-ztron-troyer

Over view of MetaZtron Vision (MZTV) Power point to John Deere

“In order to change something, don’t struggle to change the existing model. Create a new model and make the other one obsolete”.  Buckminster Fuller

August 22, 2012

Copy of White Paper Delivered to Intel in 2004; also included information about Warner tech demonstration

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — metatroy @ 2:17 pm

Metatroy Blog August 16, 2012   (edited with hash tags)

Troyer found the white paper that was requested by Intel in 2004 that she wrote.  It is amazing that it holds true today. 

Included is a white paper written by Diane Troyer that was provided on request to an Intel R&D technologist in early 2004. Intel was working on developing a LCOS projector and wanted to explore using the Troyer patented laser apparatus process in their design. They discovered the hindrance in this plan:  solid state lasers were not mature. Intel canceled their LCOS fabrication plans in late 2004 after a huge investment.

LCOS:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_on_silicon  LCoS technology can typically produce higher resolution and higher contrast images than standard liquid crystal display and plasma display technologies, which makes it less expensive to implement in such devices as televisions.  In 2004, Intel announced plans for large scale production of inexpensive LCoS chips.

Intel CEO Supports Laser Projectors for Smart Internet TV in 2011

Today Intel CEO and team are pursuing laser projection for smart internet TV.  Today (2012) Intel has a partnership with Microvision to sell their immersive Pico projector. The Intel CEO states Intel wants to provide more immersive experiences with the infinite focus dimensional attributes for larger screens for gaming and homes, etc.

There has been a discussion with Intel Corporate about the Troyer patented claims for full spectrum color reflective light valve raster scanning lasers with infinite focus. There has been study of whether Microvision is infringing the Troyer’s patents, especially if the Smart Internet TV is pursued. Also there has been discussion about collaborating for a transformed real time 2D to 3D chip, taking into account infinite focus attributes.

Experts state that Troyer’s laser apparatus patented approach with infinite sharp focused images that automatically adjusts to curved space is the answer to immersion: HIVE. Troyer calls the patented laser projector #MetatronZ (large dome) and #ZTV (smaller Z*Tron Vision). The patents cover full color spectrum laser dimensional images (Z depth in spatially modulated images).  Instead of using the awkward costly flat screen CAVE, #MetatronZ and #ZTV make possible real time curved #HIVE5D  immersion: holographic immersive virtual environments. Gamers, teens, mash up sessions, simulation, scientific, etc. Many want immersive Smart Internet TV (HIVE worlds). KISS—keep it simple streamlined with #MetatronZ and Z*Tron Vision Laser (#ZTV)

Microvision Collaborates with Capcom and Intel to Introduce New Gaming Experience, Infinite Reality http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oy2fm-fJcd4

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110728005581/en/MicroVision-Signs-Agreement-Intel-Expand-SHOWWX-Distribution

Intel Microvision Showwx + Channel Access Partner –Scanning laser projector – 15 ANSI lumens/ 848 x 480 / $318.99 . The SHOWWX projects big, bright, and colorful images that are always in focus, yet it is small enough to fit in your pocket. Connect the SHOWWX to a video output-capable device to spontaneously share photos and videos, presentations and more, for a big screen experience.

MetatronZ  & Z*Tron Vision Laser Projector: White Paper for INTEL

By Diane Troyer     July 2004

The MetatronZ and Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) patent claims include expanded colored laser beams directed to a reflective light valve. We have found that the best images are created by expanded generated laser beams that are spatially modulated on a liquid crystal light valve. Vivid light efficient images work best when in sync with the writing information. Any form of writing information (imager) can be used to create the picture. Our assembled models for our clients have near infra red CRT imagers, because the CRT is the best high resolution image (early 2000). The image was written by the CRT on the sensor back side or the ILA reflective light valve developed by Hughes. We used the Hughes JVC digital cinema projector CRT and ILA light valves. We designed the optic train. Gas lasers replaced arc lamps.  In 2004 the LCOS has become more refined and higher resolution and can be substituted for the CRT and ILA. The JVC LCoS is called the D-ILA which is a simplified method with best image with laser light.

The Troyer claims cover using any reflective light valve that uses 635 nm red or higher nm mixed with blue and green laser light to create good whites and blacks. Best full color spectrum is achieved when cyan (blue green) is added. The spatially modulated laser beams retain the coherence, collimation and polarization in the beam creating an image that is in focus on any surface. We call this attribute IF IT IS: infinite focus; instant transformation; innate sharpness (#IFITIS5D).  Any video feed has instant transformation to full color spectrum because of the deep red color mixture. Arc lamps and reflective light valves used in digital cinema are not capable of delivering images with full spectrum color.

The granted continuation patent has claims to use one as well as several light valves (RGB). These claims probably were not needed but were sought to make sure that there would be no challenge on using one light valve. Also one of the options is a claim that covers modulated combined laser colors to a white beam so the optical combining of separate colored images can be eliminated.

The MetatronZ and Z*TV architecture are simple, using few optics and thus provide great light efficiency. Laser light is coherent and collimated (focused) and does not lose energy through space. Arc lamps produce ambient light (like the sun) that is lost as it scatters.

The lasers can be separate or combined with the projector head. Any reflective light valve can be used (DLP; LED; LCoS; ILA; MEMS; or any to be invented). Patented models can be for large dome images or for a small footprint for the consumer, scientific, medical, security, simulation, signage, gaming markets.

Broader claims cover “reflective light valves” instead of liquid crystal light valves, thus the DLP mirror approach can also be used. Cinerama (curved screens) can easily be accomplished in real time with front or rear projection for the home theater and the big cinema market. Because of the infinite sharpness and transformed analogue feed, amplification is possible with filmic smoothness (no pixels or screen door effect); the laser light is evenly distributed across the curved screens. Two front surface mirrors make it possible to have a back space with a very short throw for rear projection, directing the fast moving collimated expanded beam (generated line images) on the mirrors, the merged amplified images automatically adjust to curved screen..

Moving expanded spatially modulated laser beam (generated lines) make possible artifact free images, taking advantage of the inherent laser beam focusing attributes. Flooding the light valve with laser light does not work, creating artifacts hard to control (uneven distribution of light and blurring in fast moving images).  The contrast is compromised because light spills into the black.

The worst artifact is blurring in fast moving action, especially with liquid crystal. This “ghosting effect” is one of the main problems that must be eliminated to take laser TV to the theater and home markets. The expanded laser beam that is spatially modulated by the writing information eliminates the blurring effect in the image because the light is not scattered.  Focused laser light keeps the collimation and coherence in the expanded beam. The decay/ “judder” in the reflective light valve is eliminated (LCoS, DLP). Most effective is the expanded laser beam process with sync between writing and colored lasers. Flooding the light valve with arc lamp or laser light creates the blurring artifacts and reduces the contrast, compared to the above method covered under the Troyer patent claims.

We have found that expanded laser lines scanning at 60 lines per second handle much information. How much faster are the expanded lines delivered than the 60 frames per second particles. Thus no blurring/ ghosting or latency in fast moving images.

This was proven in our Warner Brother’s technical demonstration in 2002.  The Warner experts attended a demonstration in the Warner post house (IVC, Burbank). They wanted to verify the facts that Troyer represented in her document she gave them. Full spectrum color that matched film; black blacks and white whites, high dynamic range, heat mitigation with expanded laser beam scanning; ability for images to be in focus on curved screens in real time (no computer manipulation needed); the ghosting artifacts in fast moving images eliminated. Thus the Warner experts and others have verified that the Troyer patented process eliminates blurring (Contact information on request for validation). Warner’s Chris Cookson was at demonstration. He left Warner to become head of Sony digital cinema.

The Metatron Laser demonstrations (name in 2002) were the first time viewers saw full color spectrum video images, thus realizing that more realistic colored images were possible. DCI was just starting (Digital Cinema Initiative). Howard Lukk was head engineer at IVC.  He was also head of DCI technology. After seeing the Metatron demonstration and realizing full color spectrum was possible, Howard Lukk made sure the DCI mandates included full color.  Lukk and other experts included in the DCI mandates the need for added cyan for best color, a claim that is part of the published Troyer patent 2001. Claim one state that cyan (blue green nanometer) is included in the deep red (over 635 nm) green and blue laser wave mix.  The magic of MetatronZ and Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) projector is that the full color is provided to any video feed: sports, Opera, camera, or favorite TV show. The added magic is that 2D legacy movies or other video feed appear dimensional in curved space and can be viewed from any angle in the room.

The set top box (Z-Kit) is a computer and contains server, storage, color management, up-conversion chips (scalability), etc. Studio tools are available for edit, cut, paste, etc. The editing program is a simplified version, like Apple’s Final Cut. The goal: provide a new family viewing space for interactive games, watching home movies, creating family slide shows, and original video content with the ultimate in user friendliness in a new immersive experience. See After Hours Live—page 23. Proposal and script.

Since a huge screen can be provided, maybe some families will want to purchase a model that reaches the floor so they can use the curved screen as a back set for the young 10 year old to develop their own content (green screen capability). The big thing now is video Karaoke. The user friendly tool set would be great for a new kind of family movie entertainment. Think about the ability to change the ‘worlds” as the 10 year old performs. Maybe the scenery has been designed by the 10 year old or edited from family pictures. Or a new world can be created from a scanned picture of favorite art or from photographs of a favorite nature vista. The imagination is the limit.

It is suggested that the Z-Kit have scalability with up conversion capability so that the imaging is at least 2K horizontal resolution. The conversion chip takes any feed and translates to high resolution. Consumers have a home screen that shows images as pristine as in a Cinerama film movie theater. Cinerama views, dimensional imaging and full spectrum color are not possible with arc lamp projection.

These attributes can be extended for larger screens in board rooms and as a substitute for power points in the big curved laser projected backset in conference rooms and conventions. The attributes can be extended to vivid realistic or dramatic artistic images for real time staging for opera, Broadway, music performances, etc. Intel’s stock holder meetings can be most dramatic. Steve Jobs will be knocking at your door (or leasing Z*TV for his meetings). A virtual human can be added to introduce the new products. Please see After Hours Live as an example of a formula TV show using this real time changing backset for performances. This set is called a #MetaShell. It is like a holodeck playpen.

Most important is that the laser image looks great when camera captured, whether at home, in a conference room, or in an auditorium (or with telecine).  This has been a main concern from the beginning of the research for the best images produced by the patented Metatron Laser Projection. Filming or videotaping the image is the test. There should be no blurring in fast moving images. The images should be full color (like film colors) and more realistic like nature. There should not be pixel squares in the image.  The televised Opera does not have black scanning lines or big pixel artifacts. When camera captured Microvision laser projector images are seen, black scanning appears in the image.

It was proven that amplified Metatron images looked great on a dome screen at the demonstration on the Tech Museums IMAX dome in San Jose (arranged by Roy Disney) in 2000. The demonstration was for Famous Players, Canada who wanted to use the Metatron for their 8 big screens they owned and also their smaller screens. They were also shopping for their sister company in Europe owned by Vivendi.  Barry Blackburn brought a High definition feed of a satellite boxing match to play. We also showed a DVD of Fifth Element that was line doubled in our box we used at that time (Jackson Family had invested in this break through image enhancement box).

The clients stood up and screamed when they saw the vivid focused images of boxers on the IMAX dome screen. The boxers hovered in space, the red blood flying. Metatron laser projection optic layout spatially modulates depth into each pixel. The images automatically separated forefront from the background in the curved dome space. The images were amplified with no pixels (looked like they were resolution independent). The images automatically adjusted to the dome.  The edges of the image on the dome were more even than the film images of Fantasia. The colors were film-like—full spectrum. There was no speckle in moving images.

The DVD of Fifth Element was projected through the Metatron. These images were line doubled with our image enhancement box. There were no pixels, artifacts or scanning lines in the image.

Today the Metatron Laser Projector could easily replace IMAX film projection. High end big frame gas lasers fit exactly into the same infrastructure as the IMAX big arc lamps (3 phase, 60 amps per phase and 6 gallons of water a minute for cooling).

Digital Metatron Dome Theater would be 10X less expensive; 10X less technician support; 10 X better returns from ticket sales. IMAX would also save money on not having to create expensive dome film prints.

(Troyer Note: Technicolor and Warner had just gotten the job of creating IMAX prints so were not happy about losing this business). Dome theaters, museum, science centers, municipalities, institutions, conference rooms, and signage—etc. could use domes. Great new dome theaters could be built (outdoor to replace the Drive In). Great content draws in ticket sales for self sustaining venues; 10X less cost with digital content. Many will purchase tickets to see the champion boxing match, reissues of the favorite horror movies. The National Geographic can share their TV shows or a 2D legacy features like 2001 Space Odyssey can be seen — all on dimensional big screen Cinerama (Z*Rama). The blacks are strong enough to portray star fields (Planetarium Images). Metatron digital domes can help create self sustaining dome theaters. They are closing because they do not receive the promised expensive film features needed to sell tickets.

At our dome demo in San Jose an uninvited corporate IMAX person was there and had the water and power shut off and locked the theater door, not letting the waiting technologists from Lucas, Disney and Technicolor into see the image. Troyer and this breakthrough patented technology has been attacked and smashed by modern luddites ever since. In 2003 we were to deliver laser projectors to our clients, including Raytheon/Air Force (simulation), Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish, many big theaters in Canada and Europe (Famous Players), and several themed entertainment venues. In discussion was for a dome theater at Universal City walk. Roy Disney was most interested in becoming a partner. He understood that the patented MetatronZ was the keystone to the next digital ecosystem.

The Zuddites moved in and stole the assembled projectors before they were delivered to the clients. Troyer was pulled out of her bed by police the night before the Roy Disney demonstration and taken to jail. The house was ransacked when she returned the next morning—so she called the police again and made a report, so it would be in record.   Evidently they were looking for 3D patent pending information. They did not find it. The information was in engineering notebooks under Troyer’s bed. Hired operatives were expert at disruption and finally the Troyer team dispersed out of fear – one person leaving the country to work to help Peter Jackson set up his lab in New Zealand. Troyer went into hiding and moved back to Iowa to find a safe haven. The Metatron Inc. California Company was dissolved (1992 -2003).

It has been discovered that Iowa is not a safe haven. The warning is loud and clear that Troyer and team lay low– not make public statements. It is blatant that the introduction of the patented Troyer invention is still barred by Zuddite actions (hired operatives). .

Action Taken In Iowa: Rockwell Collins wants to purchase the technology and be assigned the patents.  They sign a Promissory Agreement that they will keep the trade secrets. They want to know what next patents Troyer is working on. They defect and infringe after mining Troyer’s knowledge, vendors, having her write white papers, talk to their  engineers.  Rockwell Collins takes a huge R&D tax write off and pays Troyer nothing. For the Rockwell Collins due diligence, John Shors, attorney was hired to provide documentation that Troyer owns the technology and patents and they are “clean”. –no assignment or licensing or promises. (Documentation on request). Rockwell Collins VP is on the Iowa Development Committee and blocks her getting the demonstration grant. Is Rockwell Collins in cahoots with California Zuddites?

Troyer works with NDA with Dell Computers, Symbol/ Motorola, Telcordia. the Troyer patented process solves the Symbol Pico laser projection problems (more eye safe and better brightness).  Motorola purchases Symbol and the

A white paper has been written that is being translated into a SBIR request. This paper suggests that a software program be developed based on the infinite focus laser attributes. This software would be translated into a system on a chip that in real time would enhance the 2D to real time auto dimensional imaging (no glasses). It is assumed that a curved screen is needed for this purpose. If need be a telecine digital intermediate process could be used to translate any video feed into full colored filmic images onto a curved screen.  This process is described in the Troyer patent and covered in her claims. The telecine image would then be captured and give the impression of a dimensional images in curved space when shown on flat screens. This aspect of the Troyer patented process covers camera sensors used with the reflective light valve. The patented Metatron method can be used in post houses for transforming film and video images in real time.

Troyer Notes: IMAX is very aware that the Troyer patented Metatron Laser Projector can be placed in their dome theaters, using the IMAX electricity and water infrastructure.  IMAX could be allowing these museums and science centers to show interactive video feeds on the dome in real time. Opera, sports, 2D legacy features. The $30,000 plus film print costs would be eliminated. The $35,000 yearly arc lamp costs would be eliminated. the arc lamps start fading in brightness and color after being used 100 hours.

Example: The Cedar Rapids, Iowa IMAX Dome Theater closed down because IMAX was not providing enough content and there were low ticket sales. It was decided that the dome would be used as a demonstration place for the Troyer laser dome theater. IMAX threatened to sue Cedar Rapids and the non-profit science center if they allowed this to happen – even though Cedar Rapids owned the dome theater. (Documentation on request).  IMAX allows other dome theaters to show flat screen digital projectors so they can sell more tickets.

It is Troyer’s mission to provide low cost solid state large dome and flat screen canvas for these struggling venues. The laser projectors can also be used in flat screens, in board rooms, gaming, simulation, etc.

The first step for this purpose is to hone the basic architecture. This is best done with the smaller consumer model. The larger gas laser model prototypes and demonstrations have proven certain important criteria. Intel can help by supporting the KISS approach to the consumer market (KISS: Keep it simple—streamline). Intel can help with the steps needed to create best system on chip for real time 2D to 3D imaging in curved space.

HIVE platforms: holographic immersive virtual environments.  Dr. Adam Drobot (SAIC and Telcordia: VP of Technology) stated when he attended a Metatron Demonstration in 2003 in Burbank, California after evaluating the patents stated that the Metatron Laser Projector is the long sought solution for the CAVE. Solutions for the CAVE are being sought in many companies R&D facilities (John Deere, Rockwell Collins, etc.). Human factor research is a big CAVE area.  Simulation is another area for CAVE research. Many global Universities have areas dedicated to this area. Troyer calls the Metatron platforms the HIVE.  The HIVE makes possible a MetaShell (area for immersive interaction) which will be the path way for the constantly evolving holodeck playpen.

The writer of this proposal, Diane Troyer, feels that the best approach to creating the HIVE – holodeck playpen is to provide KISS Metatron projectors and allow the users to create applications that would enhance the HIVE platforms. Intel as a strategic partner can monitor these advancements and work in conjunction with the users to create the best software solutions with interconnectivity and compatibility within the systems. Thus the HIVE has a natural progression.

It is suggested that Intel supports providing a long term lease turnkey for local centers to be set up with a big MetatronZ  dome screen for Cinerama, Planetarium, Live Performance,  Conferences, Conventions, TV sound stage/ studio, etc. Each local portal venue (MetaSite) has a lab attached with the tool kit needed to create graphics, content, sets, etc. This local facility can provide high end jobs, job training. Sustainability comes from ticket sales for Cinerama, Planetarium. Live Performances (the music groups will love playing in the holodeck playpen), TV stage rentals, etc.

The experts hired in the ZELF lab: zone enhanced location fusion can be hired by private companies to create HIVE platforms for them. Suggested is that small device manufacturing equipment is also included in the ZELF lab for locals to lease.

Central Metatronics:  It is important that such a group of ZELF Labs attached to local MetaSites be chartered. The interconnectivity and interoperability between platforms needs to be retained. Also it seems only fair that when there is innovation that takes place in a ZELF lab that the innovators receive compensation. For this purpose alone, there needs to be a specialized virtual interactive network for where the innovation is mapped and codified and shared with the chartered members.

Content is King:  Contests can be done between MetaSites to see which has produced the best formula TV show: After Hours Live. Each uses MetaShell immersive real time staging—using the big curved Metatron screen as a changing backset. The local users keep enhancing the special effects so they present the best After Hours Live “holodeck playpen”. The HIVE platforms keep evolving. Gamers will probably be the most active in creating the HIVE worlds. The audiences will probably be as interested in the special effects technology as the famous stars performing.  Maybe the local communities can create the next Saturday Night Live – but from local stages.  Maybe we should give a proposal to NBC?

Who Benefits? Ultimately the gamers and audiences who long for immersive experiences.The government saves money on grants and R&D. Innovation is encouraged because there is a local lab with tools. Also protection is built in for the local independent inventor from big company sharks. Locale labs are set up to innovate—build on the HIVE platforms. Many DARPA, SBIR, Government grants ask to develop solutions for disaster training, security, medical devices, command & control on the ground, distributing health information, remote viewing for elderly and homebound, natural disaster communication, immersive training, etc.  SBIR grants call for more realistic duplication of evolving dimensional sensors that are following Moore’s law. Displays are way behind and seem to be gridlocked.

What High End Local Jobs are Created? Computer software, graphics, camera, edit, sets designs, directing, story writing — the list goes on. Immersion creates better games. Z*pods can be built (pods that have dome translucent covers that act as a screen for the passengers). Visit the middle of the earth, travel to Mayan times, visit Titan and go to Mars or create biofeedback modules for getting rid of phobias and brain reprogramming and healing. .

Inspire Group Work? HIVE platforms make possible STEAM TEAMS:  add A (Art) to STEM—Science, technology, engineering, math.  Teens will learn a lot as they create the best interactive game/ Cinerama in the competition.  What MetaSite ZELF lab will win the award for the best horror mash up?  Averting the Zombie Attack?

Why is it important for interactive communication between user groups? Metatron Platforms must have connectivity and interoperability. These are added attributes to create “holodeck playpen” applications. The innovators must have incentive and receive compensation for their development.

Example of Uses For HIVE Platforms: The Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL_ asked Troyer and team to use the Metatron Laser Projector to depict the 3D images from the Mars Rover’s landing for the excited waiting crowd. The Metatron would be able to show the images with great contrast on a huge curved screen—(star field Planetarium style). Because of the Zuddite interference that was not possible.  Instead 2 DLP projectors were set up (very costly) to show the 3D images coming from Mars (Planetary Society). This was an example of 10X10X10X—10X the cost; 10X not user friendly- needed many technicians; 10X worse picture. What is wrong with this picture—when the camera sensors keep evolving and the displays cannot depict the images as they are captured?

Laser Flood of Light Valve? The light valve allows simplification for this consumer model. The goal is to develop a laser solution that is efficient, long lived and not costly. The ultimate in light efficiency is also accomplished because the entire laser light is directed to one line that is scanned (painted) like the scan of the CRT. Many expanded beam laser lines can be used.   If a LCoS is used, the scan stimulates the information line on the writing side of the LCOS. High contrast is achieved because the laser line is not bleeding into the black. Liquid Crystal does not like heat. The laser scan has a fast sweep and does not create heat on the liquid crystal light valve. Flooding with arc lamps and lasers does not work. It causes ghosting artifacts, low contrast and heat problems.

What R&D still needed? We are now researching a light efficient polarizing beam splitting plate that can substitute for the cube. We are researching a more efficient delivery of the laser scan. Needed is to test the software that has been developed for more enhanced depth separation with 2D image feeds.

What is the estimation of laser wattage for brightness? The home unit can deliver motion picture brightness for a 3 ft. to 20 ft. screen with 3 to 15 watts of white light (combined modulated green, blue and green lasers).

We plan on combining full spectrum color imaging modules that deliver 12 watts of white laser light each to deliver motion picture brightness up to 60 feet wide (at least 3 modules). Since the laser scan is in sync with the imaging, merging more laser modules together becomes a simple task.

What resolution can you provide? Large full colored LCoS modules are now 2K resolution. NHK in Japan is working on 4K resolution. Larger LCOS imagers would be needed for an IMAX type dome.  More laser power, the larger the image the more surface needed to reflect laser power.

When Will the INTEL LCoS be ready for testing? The basic architecture is the same for the consumer model as for the larger models. When the INTEL LCoS is available for testing, the best, least expensive, and most user friendly approach will be chosen for each model. JVC found that with their DILA (LCoS) that a better image could be produced with separate LCoS for each color, and then the colored images are combined optically.

Market for INTEL LCoS?  Consumer, gaming, industrial, medical, security, scientific, etc. Combining full color image modules creates a bigger market for INTEL LCoS (3 to 6 LCoS are used for big movie screens (80 ft. wide).  Testing has to be done to discover the best approach for combining LCOS. Sony has been successful in their attempts to align LCOS of 4K resolution.  If Sony were able to use the Troyer patented expanded laser beam slotted approach, they would have a good image without ghosting artifacts from fast moving images. Also better contrast with no bleed into black.

Why Intel LCoS instead of Texas Instrument DLP?  There is no doubt that expanded collimated laser beams spatially modulated by a LCoS is the best most streamlined solution for displays and will deliver a much better projector than the DLP.  Having the added attribute of infinite focus adds to the formula. Delivering the Z-Kit box/electronics is a key. Customers want streamlined efficiency (push remote, long life, not replacing lamps, etc. snap in software expansion, plug in speakers, other boxes, etc.).

Life of solid state lasers? The solid state lasers are tested for 10,000 – 20,000 hours. Most arc lamps for projectors last for approximately 400 – 600 hours for full colored images. Then the arc lamp starts to fade, the colors less bright. No way has been found to stop the fading colors and brightness in arc lamps. IMAX has especially had problems with the arc lamps in their film projectors.  The tests show that the image on an IMAX screen when the lamp is new is twice as bright as seeing the image after 400 hours.  Changing the lamps is awkward with both film projectors and digital projectors. With the big IMAX, changing the bulb is dangerous (sometimes explodes), so the technician has to be fully suited for protection.

It is a hassle and costly to change bulbs with the consumer market also. Thus many customers who purchase projectors with arc lamps do not use the projector as their main TV, but for special occasions or for business. Things have been improved immensely, however for the DLP rear screen projector and DILA (JVC) projectors. Still the 10,000 plus hours guarantee for laser light is a main attribute, because the image brightness does not decay, but keeps the same brightness and color through out the life of the laser.  .

What Lens Used With Laser Light? The simplest magnifying out put lens is all that is needed with MetatonZ and Z*TV because of infinite sharpness. A simple out put lens also increases light efficiency. The DLP arc lamp projectors (Barco, Christies, DPI) need expensive lens for digital cinema. A magnifying lens for the consumer model also is less expensive than the arc lamp lens for projection.

Auto Dimensional Images?  Depth Images without glasses = holy grail of the industry. Gamers want to be more immersed in their worlds. This takes place with dimensional visuals. Reissued movies will be viewed from a new perspective in dimensional Cinerama. Infinite sharpness allows rethinking the Hologram. The ZTV lab will be testing our auto dimensional solutions. Much research has all ready been done.

Can Other Displays Show Infinite Focused Sharp Images? Only displays with laser light retaining the inherent attributes of coherence, collimation and polarization. Thus architecture of flat screens (Plasma, diodes, LED, OED, etc) cannot produce infinite focused dimensional imaging.

Possible Intel R&D and Fabrication?  We would like to discuss with Intel designing and fabricating an evolved LCoS for a more pronounced auto dimensional imaging taking into account the infinite depth of focus attribute which creates the natural separation of the foreground and background of any video feed. With infinite sharpness, the LCOS now developed will provide a pseudo dimensional imaging as long as a curved screen is used.  This is still far superior to anything on the market and provides real time dimensional simplified optical imaging without computer manipulation of the feed.

What is the Competition?

Sony: They infringe on the Troyer patents using lasers with their new liquid crystal imager (LCoS) and they deliver full color spectrum (red laser light 635 nm or over).  Prior in 2001 Sony paid $30M licensing for the Silicon Light Machine (SLM) for entertainment. They have placed millions into R&D based around this grated light valve technology. Evans & Sutherland licensed the SLM for simulation and planetariums ($10 million).

Both companies have not been able to get past the Silicon Light Machine (SLM) grated light valves low light efficiency (not bright). Also the SLM breaks the collimation and polarization in the laser beams, so the laser projector does not have the ability to adjust to curved screens (Infinite focus). The not light efficient SLM architecture needs much more laser light for motion picture brightness on the screen. The Silicon Light Machine (SLM) grating device as a modulator breaks the collimation of the lasers. Thus the SLM image, not having the collimated beams has to be focused on a flat screen.

Sony has been carefully following our progress. They switched to developing infinite sharpness after seeing the MetatronZ demonstration. Joe Morikawa who has been the Sony lead with the SLM saw the MetatronZ  projector demonstration at International Video Conversion (IVC) in Burbank in  8/02   He was shocked at the MetatronZ  ability to always be in focus. He studied the patents and wrote quite a few emails to Troyer discussing the  process.

Chris Cookson was with Warner as digital cinema technologists and viewed the MetatronZ demonstration in early 2001. This demonstration was to verify: the ghosting in the fact moving images was eliminated; the colors were full color film like spectrum and the whites and blacks are strong; heat mitigation handled with hot laser light; the images automatically adjusted to a curved screen in real time.  Mainly the Warner group of experts was gathered to verify the Troyer claims. They left the demonstrations stating—”You did it”!  Chris Cookson is now head of Sony digital cinema.

It has been reported that Sony attempted to achieve infinite depth of focus with the SLM in the Sony labs in Japan. When the evaluator who was asked to see the image shared with Troyer, he stated that Sony’s approach was to create collimation and coherence of the laser beams after the SLM grated light valve modulator. This demands many more optics and thus a more costly, more bulky optic train to optically adjust for a pseudo infinite sharpness. Also artifacts in the image are much more likely with the enlarged optic train.

The Troyer patented approach is the simplest, streamlined, optically efficient less costly approach for true infinite focus with vivid sharp depth images.

Kodak: The Kodak expert visited our Z*TV lab in 2000 in the Silicon Valley. He was in a state of shock that we were getting infinite sharpness with a reflected expanded laser beam directed to the light valve. He stated that it was against physical law. The last report was that Kodak (Germany lab) is working with developing the Kodak laser projector for digital cinema. The Kodak patented grating device modulator has the same limitations of the Sony and Evans & Sutherland SLM light valve, which breaks the coherence of the laser beam and limits the brightness (not light efficient)). Thus Kodak has the same issues as Sony in delivering a laser projector with infinite depth of focus.

Griffith Park Planetarium: John Mosley of Jet Propulsion Lab, NASA and Griffith Park Planetarium had chosen the MetatronZ laser projector for the expensive refurbish.  The attributes of full color spectrum, brightness, vivid imagery and high contrast with star field blacks was much desired. Also the fact that any video can be shown in real time, automatically adjusting to the dome would save a fortune in creating content and content delivery. The MetatronZ laser demonstration projector that was to be moved from IVC (Burbank) was stolen the night before it was to be delivered and installed in the Griffin Park Planetarium. The other 10 assembled projectors were stolen after they were picked up in Carsbad. Lexel lasers had built 30 lasers for the assembled projectors. Lexel Lasers was taken over by the Zuddites (modern luddites) for pennies.  Griffith Park/ JPL and NASA were stuck instead with the 10 times more expensive Evans & Sutherland Laser Projector.

Evans & Sutherland: They paid $10M for the rights to the SLM for military and the planetarium market. The Griffith Park Observatory paid over $6 Million for two delivered E&S projectors for their refurbish.  Two or more E&S projectors are needed because the projector does not have enough brightness for a planetarium. Also the E&S projector with the grated light valve is not capable of providing infinite focus. Racks of computers are needed to manipulate the images to be in focus in the curved space.  There will also be the problem of having image seams down the middle of the dome. The stitching needs to be in sync with the computer manipulation to prepare the images for the curved space so they are in focus. Real time imaging and automatic adjustment to the dome is not possible with the E&S laser projection. .

One MetatronZ  laser projector is capable of having the brightness for a Planetarium. With the MetatronZ projector set up so the image is in the center of the dome, no manipulation of the feed will have to be made.  Thus real time Telescopic or other space images can be shown on MetatronZ , impossible with flat screen arc projectors and with the SLM E&S projector.

JVC: DILA: Dr. Bleha is one of the unsung heroes for his invention of the light valve at Hughes. The ILA had the best image at the time and was the first reflective light valve.  The DILA (LCoS) has 3 chip imaging.  JVC is poised to approach the consumer market with their LCoS. They have the support of their mother company for a strong play.

The Home Theater/ Gaming/ Theater Market: It is amazing to watch how the DMD (digital mirror device) which is also called DLP has been milked for the digital cinema market. Christies, BARCO, IMAX licensed the DLP for the digital cinema market in 2001 Each company paid $10 million licensing fee. This still holds true today. IMAX sold their rights to NEC  and Digital Projection International.

The next big TV market will be the computer display convergence for the consumer market (In FOCUS, Runco, Samsung, Sony, etc.). Laser images will cause a short lived market for arc lamp DLP projectors, when inexpensive full spectrum color laser projectors with infinite focus are presented.

It is apparent in the fact that Sony and Kodak, after seeing the MetatronZ infinite sharpness, feel that infinite depth (sharpness) is the next break through attribute for displays. Other wise they would not have placed millions in attempting to deliver infinite focus (IF) with their grated device light valves (to no avail). Delivering dimensional images in curved space is as disruptive as when silent film became the talkies and black and white became color. When audiences experience dimensional imagery in curved space, flat screens will become obsolete, except with lap top monitors and small hand held devices.

Is Speckle a Problem? Viewers who observed MetatronZ images never stated that speckle was a problem. If the image was static (slide) there was speckle.  The deeper red, adding cyan (blue green), expanded laser beams and displacement process apparently eliminate the speckle problem (see patent explanation).

FDA Approval: The Zulip/ Jenopik German laser projector uses pulsed laser beams delivered directly out of the lens. Thus they are hindered by FDA ruling and need to project the laser beams over the audience or use rear screen projection to keep the laser beams from out of audience’s eyes. MetatronZ has been designed so that laser beams are expanded to slotted lines and reflected off the light valve through the lens.  MetatronZ  architecture delivers images with no pointed laser beams so the images are much safer for audiences and pass the FDA limitations.

It is not known if Sony and Kodak have taken the need for the FDA laser device clearance into account with their basic laser projector designs.

Conclusion:

Troyer has attempted to offer information that can be helpful in the Intel layout of LCoS and laser projectors. If you have any questions or want to have a discussion, we will be happy to oblige 

Diane Troyer

Added Iowa Information After the White Paper was sent to Intel:  It has been discovered that Iowa is not a safe haven. The warning is loud and clear that Troyer and team lay low– not make public statements. It is blatant that the introduction of the patented Troyer invention is still barred by actions of Zuddites (hired operatives). .

Action Taken In Iowa: Rockwell Collins wants to purchase the technology and be assigned the patents.  They sign a Promissory Agreement that they will keep the trade secrets. They want to know what next patents Troyer is working on. They want to know all information about vendors and clients.  Troyer is working with the AFRL, NASA. JPL, Griffith Park Planetarium and has promised that they will be delivered the MetatronZ laser projector.

Rockwell Collins:  After Bill Elkington, head of IP at Rockwell, has mined all the knowledge, vendors, white papers, talking with engineers, algorithms for scalable image enhancement server— Rockwell defects, breaking their Promissory Agreement.  Rockwell Collins starts working with the former Metatron Inc. (California Company) OEM -JVC.  Rockwell Collins takes a huge R&D tax write off for the 3 years working with Troyer and pays Troyer nothing. Rockwell Collins has stopped the movement of the technology, even though understanding how important infinite focus is for the Air Force, NASA, JPL, etc. For the Rockwell Collins due diligence, Troyer’s attorney John Shors, helped provide for Rockwell Collins documentation that Troyer owns the technology and patents and they are “clean”. –no assignment or licensing or promises. (Documentation on request). Rockwell Collins VP is on the Iowa Development Committee and blocks her getting the demonstration grant. Is Rockwell Collins in cahoots with California Zuddites?

Troyer works with NDA with Dell Computers, Symbol/ Motorola, Telcordia. the Troyer patented process solves the Symbol Pico laser projection problems (more eye safe and better brightness).  Motorola purchases Symbol and Motorola corporate is very excited about the Troyer patents.  Their attorney works with Troyer to share why Microvision is infringing her patents.  This Google purchase stops these interactions.  MetatronZ patents are not part of that transaction.

A white paper has been written that is being translated into a SBIR request. This paper suggests that a software program be developed based on the infinite focus laser attributes. This software would be translated into a system on a chip that in real time would enhance the 2D to real time auto dimensional imaging (no glasses). It is assumed that a curved screen is needed for this purpose. The image is a replica of the time of flight light field sensor (camera). The image replicates and amplifies the dimensional depth in real time. If need be a telecine type digital intermediate process could be used to translate any video feed into full colored filmic images onto a curved screen.  This process is described in the Troyer patent and covered in her claims.  This aspect of the Troyer patented process covers camera sensors used with the reflective light valve. The patented MetatronZ method can be used in post houses for transforming film and video images in real time. The chips are also able through time of flight depth scanning to take an object our of an environment (green screen effect) in real time.  This is important for the #HIVE5D performance worlds, story telling, and live real time back staging sets.  Having #IFITIS5D (infinite focus and innately sharp images provides perfect replication of the light field depth sensor information. Thus photo realism is possible.

Problems with Digital Cinema in 2002 are the same in 2012 –How to Solve? Z*TV

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — metatroy @ 12:27 pm

MetaTroy Blog August 13, 2012 

Background: Troyer Patented Laser Projector Apparatus

Metatron Inc.- Troyer California Company 1992 – 2002

First Phase: Research & Development and upgrade TRW military laser projector

Second Phase:  develop new approach and build the proof of concept model

Metatron Laser Projector: prototype and patented 1999

Griffin Group backing building prototype: 1996 – 2000

First ten JVC assembled projectors with lasers for customers: 2003 (140 pre-orders)

Griffith Park Planetarium, Raytheon (Air Force Simulation); Famous Players—Canada and sister company (Vivendi) Europe, Themed: Universal City Walk Digital Dome   

Projectors stolen before delivery by Zuddites (modern Luddites)

2003: Operatives frightened the Troyer team which broke up—went underground.

2004 —Troyer designed small projector; patents; had solid state lasers developed. 

2004:  Projector name changed from Metatron to Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) 

MetatronLaser Projector (1992 – 2004); Z*Tron Vision (name change in 2004)

How does Z*TV solves today’s problems for digital cinema?

What are the Digital Cinema issues for best images? How do we solve the problems?  

How do we stop theaters from closing — Independent Theater Association (ITA)? 

E Mail to Troyer from Bill Dever — President of ITA

 On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, devers03@netzero.net <devers03@netzero.net> wrote:

Diane,

If you have an inexpensive laser projection systems that had DCI compliance (Digital Cinema Initiative) then you have something quite profound and 2,000 theatres would fall into your lap. The issue is for many September is the drop dead date….they need a solution now or they are going away. But you need the following;

1. At least two working prototypes
2. The ability to manufacture in a very short period of time

I am interested, but I have little financial capability at the present moment and am actively working to prevent closure of theatres.

Bill Dever 

Troyer note: Some theaters use a JVC small projector that does not have DCI clearance. Thus they are not allowed to show Hollywood Studio movies.

http://www.ita-usa.com/?p=2411

Solution to Deliver DCI Digital Projector for 2000 Plus Theaters

Troyer’s patented Z*Tron Vision Laser Projector has been validated by experts to solve the Digital Cinema problems.  Troyer’s company, Metatron Inc., was the OEM for the JVC Hughes projector (1998 – 2003), but that process was stopped by competitors. It is suggested that Troyer and Team again make a deal with JVC (or other vendor) to assemble DCI approved Troyer laser projectors.  

The Troyer patented process is KISS: keep it simple—streamline; low cost and also best image; full spectrum color, high contrast, real time Cinerama – Very high ticket sale with audiences longing for the new immersive thrill. Z*TV transforms any video feed to vivid bright dimensional Cinerama. Grab tickets to the dimensional Cinerama Vegas boxing or world soccer championship matches (or any sport), Opera, Music tours, 2D legacy features, National Geographic shows, etc. Hollywood studio movie open in dimensional Cinerama – video feeds delivered any way, any time.  Laser Z*TV optically changes any feed to vivid dimensional Cinerama— automatically, real time (also flat screens).    

KISS Solution: Not only are the ITA theaters closing, but also there is a great struggle for small theater chains, planetariums and dome IMAX type theaters. They all need an inexpensive KISS digital solution.  There are many digital theaters being installed globally. There needs to be a KISS inexpensive solution for Brazil’s multi-purpose venues in each community with cinema, theater, conferences, club, performances, town meeting house, teen hang out, tools for content creation, real time staging TV shows. 

Chaotic Approach for Last Ten Years to Digital Cinema:Sony, BARCO, Christies, NEC, Dolby, and many other companies have struggled to deliver digital cinema. There needs to be a strong focused Digital Cinema Solution to stop another ten years of contentious battling.  Because of past interferences Troyer and team will not proceed unless they have support and protection from a strong strategic partner. The patented Z*TV is “disruptive.”  The days are over when modern Luddite operatives get by with stopping the Z*TV progress so their stock does not crash.   

 LIPA Consortium:   http://lipainfo.org/about-lipa/primary-objectives/

Quote:  LIPA members believe that laser projectors hold many advantages over traditional projection techniques and that over time and with further development of laser technology, the advantages will grow. Projector manufacturers have long sought to develop products that provide the best possible picture on the theater screen. Xenon short-arc lamps have served the industry well and provided the best solution for many years — even with their handling safety hazards, high-temperatures, relatively-short lifetimes and difficulty of transportation and disposal. As in every other facet of life, technology continues to advance and lasers now promise advantages over the Xenon bulbs in high end projectors. They have the potential for:

  • Brighter pictures & Expanded color gamut
  • Lower power consumption
  • Longer life
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fewer heavy metals
  • More flexible systems

Metatroy Blog August 14, 2012

 A List of a some of the Companies and people who attended Metatron Laser Demonstrations (1996 – 2003): Sony, Disney, Dolby, IMAX, Kodak, Warner, Universal, Dream Works, Technicolor, Panavision, Carmel Development, Griffin Group, Griffith Park Planetarium, Jet Propulsion Lab, NASA, Siegfried (Siegfried & Roy), Pink Floyd, Michael Jackson, etc. Shamrock (Roy Disney), Technology experts from these companies have attended the Metatron (Z*TV) California laser demonstrations and received white papers. It can be shown that these groups have realized for quite some time that laser projection is the solution—realizing this when they viewed the Troyer laser images on a large video screens including domes.  

https://metatroy.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/email-to-lipa-lude-troyer-laser-ztv-412/

https://metatroy.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/ztron-vision-ztv-troyer-metatroy-perspective/ 

Expert Evaluation 2002

Experts attend demonstration to verify that certain issues are resolved: 2002

The experts verify that indeed the problem issues are resolved: 2002/ 2003

The Zuddites (modern Luddites) stopped Z*TV from being delivered to clients

Today the same problems are issues; the industry is still looking for solutions

Example: Warner (Chris Cookson, Greg Thagard); Telcordia/ SAIC (Dr. Adam Drobot), DCI (Howard Lukk), JPL/ Griffith Park Planetarium (John Mosley); Sony—etc.

 Issues to be solved for digital cinema big screens (2002 -2012) 

  1. Full Color spectrum that is film like  (arc lamps do not deliver full color)
  2. High contrast with good whites and blacks (star field quality blacks)
  3. No artifacts- ghosting’ blurring in fast moving images and with stereo
  4. Heat mitigation—reduce needed cooling for higher wattage big screens projection
  5. Vivid colored bright images (today’s stereo glasses and filters – dull—not bright  
  6. Ability to show 3D dimensional images on curved screens (need lasers light)
  7. Inexpensive real time transformation with depth factor from 2D to 3D.  

Warner VP of Technology & Experts View MetaTron Projector Images

In 2002 Warner Brothers VP of Technology, Chris Cookson and his colleagues asked Troyer and team for a private demonstration of the Metatron Laser Projector. The Burbank demonstration of the Laser Projector was in the leased lab at the International Video Convergence (IVC) post house in the old secure Lockheed Skunk Works building. IVC was the Warner post house where their features were transferred to DVD.  Troyer claimed certain attributes that the Warner team wanted to verify by seeing the patented prototype.  Note: white paper with claims provided for Warner group available. 

State of Digital Cinema 2001 – 2003

At that point there was a battle of which digital cinema projector to adopt. The main battle was between the JVC Hughes with an ILA liquid crystal reflective light valve. The other was a projector made by Texas Instrument with a digital mirror device (DMD) reflective light valve (DLP). IMAX, BARCO and Christies had paid $10 million each for rights to use the DLP for digital cinema.  The DMD had little mirrors that moved for the modulation. The small mirrors appeared like big squares in the enlarged big screen images.  The JVC Hughes had a better image with no pixel squares, but had blurring in fast moving images. JVC also had problems with arc lamp heat created for big screen images. Liquid crystal does not like heat, thus it was difficult to keep the images stable.

Grating Light Valve for Lasers: Stanford graduates developed the Silicon Light Machine (SLM) grating light valve. Sony licensed it for entertainment paying $30 million dollars in 2001.  Evans & Sutherland licensed the SLM for simulation and planetariums and paid $10 million.  Rockwell Collins paid E&S 72.5 million for rights to simulation and planetarium and SLM laser projector in 2006. Kodak was patenting and working on their own version of the grating light valve for lasers.  By 2007 it as finally established that the grating light valve approach was a lemon and mothballed.  

FACT: Digital Cinema Uses Reflective Light Valves:  DLP, ILA/ LCOS, etc.

JVC Hughes had turned their ILA projector over to Metatron Inc. as the OEM because the Metatron Laser Projector had solved their problems and added attributes of full color images, great blacks and whites and vivid in focus images on curved screens. The problems stopping the digital cinema layout of the JVC ILA were heat mitigation and artifacts (ghosting, blurring, heat on Liquid Crystal). 

Heat mitigation: Fast moving expanded laser lines did not create heat.  Troyer proved this by holding her hand in the path of the expanded laser beams as they were directed to the ILA light valve. Full spectrum color and high contrast: Troyer’s patent shared how to create full color images with mixed laser light (use deeper red- 635 nm or over). Got rid of the blurring and ghosting in fast moving images:  Expanded laser beams are focused and do not scatter. They do not bleed into the black (improves contrast). The fast moving expanded laser beams cover one slot at a time, thus eliminating the problem of seeing the liquid crystal light valve slow decay which caused the blurring / ghosting.  Flooding the light valve with arc lamp light ruined the contrast and caused the ghosting (blurring). 

2012: Today the blurring artifact problem is still not solved. This article calls it the “Judder”. http://www.studiodaily.com/2012/08/trumbull-muren-and-others-vouch-for-high-frame-rate-cinema/

 2000 – 2003—3D: The industry was excited about going digital because they would save money on film prints. They were not concentrating on 3D at that point.  Finally the problem of not full spectrum dull (not bright) images showed up when digital 3D was delivered by arc lamps. Troyer was ringing the alarm with her laser demonstration to main studio players that arc lamp digital cinema was not film like because of the limited color spectrum. The reds were orange. There were no deep magentas, purples and honey mustard colors. The images looked like a big TV.

JVC Hughes Base Projector with ILA Light Valve: Troyer chose the JVC Hughes with an ILA reflective light valve as the base projector, because the Hughes ILA was the most evolved reflective light valve to show best spatially modulated laser images. The infra red CRT produced the picture (best image at that time).  The light source was argon and krypton lasers. The laser light optic train was designed by Troyer and team so that the collimation, coherence and polarization were retained in the image on the screen.

 The Warner experts at the Burbank lab verified that the Troyer claims were true

  • Full spectrum color that matched film
  • High contrast with good white and blacks (star field quality)
  • Heat mitigation with laser raster scanning method.
  • Always in focused images, even on curved surfaces – with any video feed
  • Ghosting (blurring) artifacts in fast moving images were eliminated.

 DCI (Digital Cinema Initiative) Mandates Full Color Spectrum

The Metatron demonstrations were the first time viewers saw full color spectrum video images, thus realizing that more realistic colored images were possible. Also the Troyer patent was published February 2001 so the claims could be studied, the first claim calling for the deeper red (635 nm or over) with cyan (blue green) added. The Troyer patent explained prior laser patents that called for more orange red for better brightness and to match the color standard at that time.  Orange red limited the color spectrum span.  

 DCI was just started (Digital Cinema Initiative). Howard Lukk was head engineer at IVC post house, but also VP of Technology for DCI. After seeing the Metatron demonstration and realizing full color spectrum was possible, Howard Lukk made sure the DCI mandates included full color.  The DCI mandates also call for the addition of blue green cyan to enhance the laser color wavelengths of Red, Green and Blue. Troyer’s patent explains why adding deeper red and cyan reduces speckle.

http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/troyer-patent-portfolio-2012

Read the 2001 patent claims in the published Troyer patent. Claim One states that cyan (blue green nm) is added with deep red (over 635 nm) green and blue laser wave mixture. 

Magic of MetaTron (Z*TV): auto dimensional imaging

Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) automatically transforms any video feed to full color: Boxing match, sports, Opera, live camera images, or favorite TV show. The added magic: 2D legacy movies or other feeds appear dimensional on curved screens and are in focus from any angle in the room. The Z depth factor is spatially modulated into every pixel in the expanded laser beam and retained to the screen. This is only possible if the attributes of lasers are retained in the image: collimation, coherence and polarization. The modulated pixel Z factor automatically provides depth (3D) to the images by separating the foreground from the background, enhanced when images are on curved screens.  

3D Titanic: Global post house struggle to find best 2D to 3D process. James Cameron spent millions using a costly and time consuming 3D process with his 2D legacy feature: Titanic. Cameron and team delivered Avatar, the reigning première 3D experience, after spending years building stereo cameras and studying best camera angles and layered graphics for best immersion. What are Cameron’s conclusions?

TechCrunch Interview with James Cameron

TechCrunch: Is the future of 3D about the movies or TV?

Cameron: The future of 3D will be defined by TV. The reason for that is it’s going to solve this whole conversion issue. Because the 3D production cycle for TV is so short. You don’t have time to do a conversion. It just doesn’t exist. It’s just not part of the vocabulary. So, the tools for shooting it, posting it, delivering it, displaying it, are all going to be proven in the TV markets and then movie guys are just going to have to get in line with it.

TechCrunch: What do you think about the state of 3D TV’s?

Cameron: Mid level big flat panels are 3D now. — It’s really not that big a deal anymore. So, I think where it’s ultimately got to end, is glasses free viewing in the home, on the big screen.

Today Converting 2D to 3D

http://www.google.com/patents/US7116324

Converting 2D to 3D— this is a Digital Domain patent purchased from True 3D. This patented process can be compared to other 2D to 3D software. Reading the claims gives an idea why the 2D to 3D process is so time consuming and costly.  Imagine the shock when it is realized that this can be done in real time with the Z*TV patented process – as well as real time color enhancement.  The 3D transformed 2D image can be enhanced with real time 2D to 3D depth software or post manipulated in the DI (digital Intermediary) process.  Z*TV is the ultimate in KISS: keep it simple: streamline with the instant transfer (IT) of the video feed to Z depth infinite focused vivid colored images. 

Today the Judder Effect

http://www.studiodaily.com/2012/08/trumbull-muren-and-others-vouch-for-high-frame-rate-cinema/ — There is still a big issue with blurring and ghosting. This article calls it “Judder”. Many feel that a faster frame rate will cure the problem.  The Troyer patented process eliminates any of these artifacts as long as the optic path is set up correctly and the teaching of the Troyer’s claims is followed.  The demonstration models images that eliminated “judder” were set at 60 cycles per second for expanded laser lines that were spatially modulated line by line.  

 

3D Without Glasses is the Cat’s Meow

http://www.patentgenius.com/patent/8072488.html

Ed Buckley founder of Light Blue Optics wrote a patent in 2004 in England with colleagues—that was for what they called “holography”. Buckley and team raised over $150 million for a “holographic” laser projector that had infinite focus (adjusted to curves) they called Light Blue Optics (LBO).  The projector infringes on the Troyer patent claims. Buckley and the other founder left Light Blue Optics and are now helping support other display companies.  

June 8, 2012

Display: cyan reduces speckle; Sony/Laser Light Engine projector

This is a copy of an Insight Display article by Matt Brennesholtz

http://www.display-central.com/lle-provides-details-speckle-new-products/

LLE Provides Details on Speckle & New Products

May 23, 2012 | Filed under: Display Daily, Projection Technology | No Comment

by: Matt Brennesholtz

Sony and Laser Light Engines (LLE) provided the first public demo of a speckle free laser illuminated cinema projector at NAB Technology Symposium on Cinema (TSC) (formerly known as Digital Cinema Summit) last month in Las Vegas, as reported by Chris Chinnock in the May Issue of LDR. This follows the private Barco demo last January, as discussed in Display Daily on February 8th.

I took this as an opportunity to talk to Bill Beck, Founder and EVP of Business Development of LLE about both the demo and upcoming products from LLE. Beck said that the main goal of the demo was to show it was possible to get a despeckled image on a silver screen. This was important because despeckled images are much easier to achieve on low-gain matte screens but the exhibitors need to be shown that low speckle can be achieved in 3D presentations using silver screens. Silver screens are required for 3D technology using passive polarization glasses, such as the ones used by RealD or MasterImage. In theory wavelength selection (Dolby) and active glasses 3D can use matte screens, although high-gain screens are often used even in these installations to increase the 3D brightness.

Beck said the main speckle issue with laser cinema, especially in the LLE/Sony demo, is the green. He says this occurs for several main reasons:

  1. The human eye has      the highest sensitivity in green so the green looks much brighter than the      red or blue.
  2. The human eye has      its highest resolution in the green, so it is easier to perceive the small      features of speckle. It is also easiest to perceive that the speckle      features are hiding small features contained in the displayed image.
  3. The      frequency-doubled green laser normally has a very narrow bandwidth, on the      order of 0.2nm, causing more speckle.

He added that in a 3D demonstration, such as the one at NAB, polarization diversity cannot be used, eliminating one normal tool of despeckleing.

Beck says that the LLE “Secret Sauce” technology for speckle reduction is the ability to spectrally broaden the green light to as much as a 20 – 30nm bandwidth. He declined to say exactly how broad the green bandwidth was in the NAB demo and, not surprisingly, he declined to say exactly what this “Secret Sauce” technology was.

Beck told Insight Media that LLE had recently introduced the RGB100 rack-mounted laser product. This unit is intended as a xenon-replacement system, not for new designs. LLE also offers red, green and blue modules on an OEM basis. The RGB100 is a standalone, despeckled RGB laser light source for 3 chip digital projection systems. It delivers 100+ W of color-controllable RGB light, for a total of over 28,000 white balanced lumens into the projector. Red, green and blue wavelengths are 638nm, 545nm and 445nm respectively. The combined RGB light is transmitted to the projector via a single armored optical fiber cable with a 400 or 440µm diameter core and a 0.22 NA. Delivery of the first units will be in June, 2012. The data sheet on the rack-mounted RGB100 system can be downloaded from the LLE web site, as can the preliminary specifications on the green OEM module. The LLE procedure for measuring speckle is also available for download.

For an expanded version of this story, including more information on laser speckle and how lasers can best be used in 3D presentation of cinema and other content, see upcoming issue Large Display Report.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Troyer Note: Yes Matt Brennesholtz, as you might be aware after our phone conference two years ago— I agree with Sony’s secret sauce solution. My first patent claim in 2001 stresses the “secret sauce” (below). Also my US patents 2005, 2006, and 2012 and the allowed Canadian patent 2011 claims. All have claims with lasers addressed to a reflective light valve with red 635 nm or over. Cyan is added that is shorter wave length blue green—(488 nm — 510 nm), which reduces the speckle and produces more saturated colors with better whites and blacks.

We have found that by using deeper red and adding cyan with the RGB, that the speckle is greatly reduced, as explained in my Troyer patent description and in the Troyer patent claims. The classic solid state laser green is 532 nm which is nearer yellow green and therefore has more speckle. Note—In the article Matt states that the laser green that Sony is using is 545 nm. I think this is a mistake—it should be 535 nm. If Sony is using 545 nm – good luck with their color. No wonder they need more green wavelengths.

Read http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/metatroy/troyer-patent-portfolio-2012/1

These Facts Can Be Shown: This process of using “cyan” for reduction in speckle and for a more saturated full color with a better white and black is discussed in the Troyer patent description. Those attending the demonstrations were provided white papers on color. Suggested is that they read the explanation in the published Feb 2001 patent.

The Troyer Metatron Laser Projector demonstrations in the early 2000’s were the first time the expert attendees viewed full color spectrum in digital cinema projection. Thus they realized that video could have film like colors also. None of the viewers complained about speckle because the Troyer patented process reduced the speckle in the motion picture images. Some speckle could be seen in still images. Troyer did a lot of R&D by testing different wavelengths. She had the fortune of being able to use dye lasers where she could change the red colors (Read about speckle elimination in the Troyer patent portfolio description).

Among the attendees: Merv Griffin Group (investors and partner); Roy Disney and Imagineering Group; display experts from Dolby, Kodak, Sony, Panavision, Universal theme parks, IMAX, Warner, Carmel Development, Air Force, Raytheon, Griffith Park Planetarium, Runco, Famous Players, many cinema theater groups and Vegas groups, etc. The main interest was for dome themed entertainment venues.

Chris Cookson was with the Warner technology group who saw the demonstration at the most secure post house in Burbank: International Video Conversion (IVC). IVC did the Warner film conversions. Chris Cookson is now head of motion picture technology at Sony (a copy of the white paper distributed to the Warner group is available on request).

Greg Thagard was with Warner and set up the demonstration to check the Troyer claims: full spectrum saturated color images with limited speckle in moving images; twice the contrast than with arc lamps; heat mitigation from fast moving laser expanded beams; and mainly the biggest problem with using the JVC Hughes ILA in digital cinema—the ghosting (blurring) in fast moving images.

The main criticism of using the JVC ILA (Liquid Crystal) instead of the DLP arc lamp projectors was the blurring artifacts in fast motion. Warner tech experts viewed the laser images automatically adjust to a big curved screen and also a balloon and realized that any video feed in “real time” could be transformed to full color and adjust to a curved screen. That in itself would save the studios a fortune in post house fees. Digital Cinema theaters would have interactivity for gaming and live football games and Opera in big screen Cinerama.

Troyer showed the viewers the heat mitigation of that the slotted fast moving lasers by passing her hand through the direct path of the moving expanded laser beams. (Flooding with lasers or arc lams produces burning heat). The blacks (contrast) were much more pronounced because the slots of laser light were not bleeding into the black. There were no ghosting artifacts.

The demonstration proved the problems were solved. The Warner guys said –You did it!!! And were most excited.

Howard Luck was head technology engineer at IVC lab in Burbank. He was delighted with the laser projector and wanted to start doing the classic measurements. Troyer and team were quite happy to give him any information he wanted about the projector. He was head of technology on the DCI committee. He would make suggestions for Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI) standards. Thus adding cyan is a suggested DCI mandate for better color saturation. Also because DCI knew full video filmic color was possible, the DCI made a mandate for full color spectrum images.

Ken Holland who owned IVC at that time was very upset. Warner was his main customer. He rushed into the lab screaming at Troyer and her engineer when they were setting up for the Warner demonstration “You are not going to get by with this!” That proved to be true. Modern Luddites stopped the demonstration projector delivery to Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish. The projector, equipment and optics were stolen from the IVC lab right before the move. Also stolen and never recovered were the ten projectors built for waiting clients. Troyer calls the disrupters “Zuddites” (Modern Luddites).

Dave Schnelle was with Ken Holland when he screamed at Troyer and the engineer. Schnelle is now with Dolby and the LIPA consortium. At NAB 2012 Troyer asked Schnelle what he thought when he heard Ken Holland yell those words? He just shook his head, remembering and said it was a long time ago.

Ken Holland made his money in the color theater where they pushed the digital cinema arc lamp colors to be more film like. The Metatron Laser Projector would hurt the post house business. After the Warner demonstration Howard Lukk was told he could not have discussion with Troyer or her team. Troyer and team were locked out of the lab and had to have permission to have demonstrations. The lease for the lab had been paid up front so there was no legal basis for the lock out. The equipment was owned by Metatron Inc. — California Corporation.

Troyer hired attorneys and threatened to have a press conference outside the IVC post house. The Troyer team was allowed to get into their lab for a demonstrations for Dr. Adam Drobot from SAIC/ Telcordia and a high end gaming executive. Drobot is considered a high end evaluator of patents and technology. Troyer and guest engineer were actually walked out of IVC when they went in to help set up the demonstration, with the threat of the police being called. Ken Holland evidently was in collusion with the Zuddites who were making sure the “Metatron Laser Projector” was not placed in a venue

After viewing the Metatron images, Dr. Drobot stated that the Troyer patents are strong, that the images could be compared to film and that the laser projector was the long awaited solution for the CAVE (simulation virtual reality, HIVE) because of the infinite focus.

Roy Disney was a great advocate of the Metatron. The great sabotage came when Roy Disney was to see another Metatron demonstration. That never happened. Events were such that the demonstration was canceled and the engineer team freaked. Dean Lyon decided to go work in New Zealand and help Peter Jackson set up his lab. It is dangerous to be involved with disruptive technology in the USA.

The Troyer team was stopped by sabotage of the Zuddites. When nothing else worked to stop Troyer, they just made the projectors disappear. Thus Troyer and team were not able to deliver and install the 10 JVC laser projectors to Famous Players and the Military and Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish. h. Much time was wasted. Much interference was wrought by the Zuddites. The FBI was called in but to no avail at that time.

Chris Cookson took the information to his high tech job at Sony. Other Sony technology experts also had seen Metatron demonstrations. Chris Cookson would not accept Troyer’s calls in 2010 about working with Sony (emails sent). It is interesting that Sony thinks they can blatantly infringe. The fact that Troyer and team can prove Sony knows they are infringing is dangerous for a big company, because the charge for infringement is tripled. IMAX and Barco are also infringing. Kodak does not have the patents needed to cover the basic laser process being proclaimed by the LIPA consortium (See email to LIPA and Sony’s Pete Ludi in prior metatroy wordpress blog). The Warner group endorsed the laser projection image as best video image: full spectrum saturated film colors, much higher contrast—good blacks, no ghosting in fast moving images, and heat mitigation. The industry is still attempting to deliver filmic images with good contrast and eliminating blur artifacts.

The Troyer laser projector proves that laser images far surpass arc lamp images. Infinite focus was introduced with the ability to adjust to curves (Microvision, Light Blue Optics, Aaxatech). Z depth is spatially modulated into the pixel to create auto dimension. (See Troyer patent optic drawings). These exciting attributes streamline and lower costs. They make dome theme park venues possible. Finally KISS Cinerama: keep it simple—streamlined and user friendly.

Experiencing “Being there” in space was finally possible. JPL and NASA dimensional images on a big curved Planetarium screens with Dr. Donald Gurnett’s captured space sounds in sync with the images. John Mosley of JPL was the producer and had discovered the Metatron for the Planetarium. There was weeping when the Metatron was stolen out of IVC and not delivered. Griffith Park Planetarium was forced to deliver a sub- standard experience. Maybe finally audiences today can have that great experience— and not have to wait another 10 years.

IMAX could not have us show our projector. Their stock would crash – not only because we were replacing the IMAX film dome experience, but also because the JVC ILA would probably be the choice over the DLP. IMAX was the lead in introducing the Texas Instrument DLP for digital cinema. They had purchased the arc lamp reflective light valve projector from England and paid $10 million dollar licensing fees to Texas Instruments. Barco and Christies also each paid $10 million dollar licensing fees. This still holds true today. IMAX sold their rights to NEC and kept the rights for Digital Projection. IMAX is now working with Barco for the laser projector with the DLP. Sony and RED are using LCoS—liquid crystal. All are reflective light valves.

Troyer Patent US 6183092; February 6, 2001 – Claim One

1. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; further laser apparatus for projecting one or more picture beams that include green and blue laser light; and wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black; wherein the further laser apparatus projects substantially cyan light with the blue and green light;

wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; and further comprising means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when present in such a picture; said suppressing means comprising the combination of:
means for displacing the beam substantially as a unit, during its projection; said light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer; and said cyan light.

Troyer Notes: Full color spectrum is created with lasers that are addressed to a reflective light valve (RLV). The claims were broadened to all RLV in US 2006 and US 2012 and the Canadian patent (allowance notice Feb. 2011). The liquid crystal light valve is now a secondary claim. All reflective light valves are covered. All digital cinema projectors use reflective light valve (RLV) at this time: DLP, LCoS, LED, MEMS, or any to be invented.

Full Color Spectrum with Deeper Red: All laser projectors need to provide full color spectrum for best image. In order to have full color spectrum with deep magenta and purple and mustards, the red needs to be 635 nm or over. Adding cyan has proven to provide better color spectrum and is stated in the DCI—digital cinema initiative for best color balance. Cyan also reduces the speckle caused by green lasers in the 532 nm range. Also using a deeper red supports eliminating speckle and a more saturated image.

This claim covers full spectrum color (using deeper red—635 nm red). The art before stated that orange red (610 nm) had to be used for more image brightness and to match the NTSC (TV) analog color chart. This orange red caused more speckle because of the shimmer. The claim with 635 nm red or above thus covers full spectrum filmic color with speckle repression with a reflective light valve (RLV).

“Secret Sauce” Solution for Sony and Laser Light Engine: Did Sony and LLE techs read the recipe for the secret sauce in the Troyer patents, when they could not get rid of their speckle. Adding Cyan, however, is now pretty standard since it is one of the DCI mandates for better saturated color. Deeper red and cyan also create a secondary color plateau for yellow, magenta, and cyan.

Leap Frog Patent by Kodak and Barco: The LIPA Consortium including Kodak, IMAX, Barco and Sony think that they are “leap frogging”—writing around the Troyer patents by combining the lasers into what they call parallel projection, which is a form of merging expanded parallel lines of laser beams to become more of a flood process. Read the first claim of the first patent 2001. The claim is broad (does not specify) how the lasers are addressed to the reflective light valve. Troyer’s preferred method is discussed. This is an expanded beam scanning in sync with the video information when possible (film or slide image information not delivered in raster format).

Note: Kodak has a leapfrog patent that stresses adding cyan to RGB in the description, but it is not in the claims.

Read http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/metatroy/troyer-patent-portfolio-2012/1

May 14, 2012

Z*Tron Vision Troyer Patent Claim Chart and Metatroy notes

TROYER STATEMENT                                                                May 2012

Note: This document has added information — The patent claim chart was published on the Metatroy blog, April 17th:  the chart can be found on page later in this document. Patent claims are included for a better survey. The Canada patent claims (notice of allowance Feb. 28, 2011) are available on request.  They will be published shortly. They are broad: all reflective light valves (RLV) and also lasers directed to the RLV. Scanning on the RLV is a sub claim.

Troyer’s patents represent Z*Tron Vision which is a laser apparatus with projector and camera.  The Troyer patent process provides attributes: IF IT IS- infinite focus, instant transformation, and innate sharpness. These attributes make possible the long awaited dimensional HIVE: holographic immersive virtual environments.

Z*Tron Vision is the linchpin to the HIVE – as important as the printing press was to publishing.

HIVE platforms are created with apps. It is predicted that there will be many applications developed for the HIVE – a la Apple.  There are many talents creating apps for the Microsoft Kinect. The Kinect camera could be used as the camera in the Feb. 14, 2012 Troyer patent.  There are many uses for the patented laser camera/ projector.

These facts are shown to be true:

  • Laser video projectors will replace arc lamp digital cinema projectors.
  • Laser TV: home theaters, gaming, signage, industrial, simulation, medical, theme parks, etc.

Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) will be the display of choice: KISS (keep it simple: streamline)

  • Z*TV is a basic patented process that provides a linchpin laser apparatus.
  • Many apps (applications) will work with the linchpin Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV).
  • The Troyer laser projector patented process is user friendly and the most streamlined.
  • Troyer basic patents are KISS: leapfrogging is difficult (write around).

What will be the best 3D: huge domes to small auto stereo (w/o glasses)?  All auto stereo displays demonstrated so far have limitations. For instance there were two demonstrations at NAB. One was by Dolby (with Philips) and the other by a Japanese research group.

  • The displays cannot use the infrastructure that exists now to deliver the image.
  • Many different facets/ lenticular approach—expensive and not streamlined.
  • Not a pure viewing angle. Limited by participants position.  Not wide angle views.
  • Participants need to be at specific area for best view—thus not good for crowd viewing.

The next big market is predicted to be the Apple /Smart/ Internet/ Google/ TV. Many are predicting what the attributes of the Smart TV will be:

  • Auto dimensional (3D w/o glasses)—this means images with depth (3D)
  • Not limited viewing angle, thus vivid at any place in the room
  • Anyone sitting anywhere in the room has a good view (without glasses)
  • Full spectrum color/ high contrast (good blacks)/ sharp vivid images
  • Camera / projector (display) combination — Kinect type feedback –range sensor
  • Use today’s infrastructure (delivery, content, equipment)
  • Suitcase, modular — (user friendly—easy to move, mobile, fast set up)
  • No flat screen distortion of dimensional images (endoscopic or Mars 3D images).

TechCrunch: Is the future of 3D about the movies or TV? Interview with James Cameron

Cameron: The future of 3D will be defined by TV. The reason for that is it’s going to solve this whole conversion issue. Because the 3D production cycle for TV is so short. You don’t have time to do a conversion. It just doesn’t exist. It’s just not part of the vocabulary. So, the tools for shooting it, posting it, delivering it, displaying it, are all going to be proven in the TV markets and then movie guys are just going to have to get in line with it.

TechCrunch: What do you think about the state of 3D TV’s?

Cameron: Mid level big flat panels are 3D now. — It’s really not that big a deal anymore. So, I think where it’s ultimately got to end, is glasses free viewing in the home, on the big screen

IF IT IS attributes are considered transformative for the next display platforms.  IF IT IS attributes are desired by:

  • Consumers for their Smart TV and home theater.
  • Digital Cinema audiences.
  • Military/ government wait for dome/ CAVE/HIVE immersive training/ simulation
  • Signage — innovative approach with depth of focus (ability to be shown real time on curves)
  • Opera/ Broadway/ music tour, staging and backsets for performance/ content productions
  • Telecine:  post house and consumer copying film, slides, video, — any feed
  • Medical:  ability to see captured dimensional images such as endoscopic camera images—not distorted on flat screens, but seen with best image (contrast, resolution, color ranges, layers, dimensional, always in focus—MRI slices can be put together in real time for dimensional images vivid images).
  • Scientific/ Instrumentation/ Microscopic/

HIVE Platforms:  Z*Tron Vision is the linchpin to the HIVE – as important as the printing press was to publishing. Many applications will be created and streamlined by the linchpin HIVE attributes. Augmented Reality/ Virtual Reality/ CAVE/ Telepresence.  How? Real time dimensional images in curved space —cuts the costs and time taken by more than 50%.  The HIVE is user friendly.  The HIVE platform attributes are sought by Location based entertainment venues; Themed park entertainment, immersive training and learning, etc.

ZELF:  Zone Enhanced Location Fusion — Some suggested private / public/ non-profit franchises:

  • MetaSite gaming immersive mini theaters
  • WarpZone:  gaming / group/ new approach to gaming arcades
  • Bucket of Dreams:  advanced Chucky Cheese franchise
  • Teen Green Screen with content tool kits: from creating local games to Horror interactive movies with merchandising or fractal immersion rooms or traveling to different times in history or to space :  a place for teens to play congregate and have hands on learning.
  • STEAM TEAMS: Placing art (A) into STEM (science, technology, engineering, math)
  • ZPA (healing spa devices and venues):  laser light healing / communing/ sports healing/ beautification for aging/ animal healing/ get rid of arthritis/ cleansing/ healing
  • ZPA labs: develop devices for sports healing, etc.
  • MetaStation: dome train rides–
  • MetaSphere: combination Dome Screens for Z*Rama movies, Planetarium, Backset staging for performance/ extravaganza – also associated with a lab for applications for the HIVE.
  • Backsets Karaoke/ Performance clubs: Automatic backsets projected with singer performing (small Z*TV projector camera—capture and project performer in sets (often they design their staging)

Troyer is an independent inventor, meaning she is not associated with a big company or institution. The claim chart below lists companies that are infringing on the Troyer patented process.  Troyer has been offered upfront payment by the king of the patent “trolls” company that has been quite successful in helping patent holders receive a great return from infringers. They do not pay to play unless they know they can win.  Those experts who understand this patent area state that if handled right, the Troyer patents are a gold mine. Troyer is getting offers from many areas.  Her Canadian patent attorney has advised Troyer, since there is so much interest, that she put the patent troll offer on the backburner and hire a well-respected strong attorney in her inventions niche area that is adept at making deals and licensing. Troyer is now seeking that attorney to provide guidance.

Digital Cinema and Dome 3D: Troyer has demonstrated her patented big laser TV to main players. Some of these companies have recently formed a Laser Illuminated Projector Association (LIPA) set up to promote and market laser projection for digital cinema.  They promote lasers addressed to a reflective light valve, full color spectrum, and retaining the polarization for best bright 3D. The LIPA consortium members consisting of Kodak, Sony, IMAX, NEC, Dolby, Disney, THX, Christies, Barco and Texas Instrument, etc. Most have attended the Troyer demonstrations and received white papers, etc.  Kodak has shown a prototype laser projector based on the Troyer patents.  Peter Lude, the LIPA chairman has been informed that the consortium is promoting Troyer’s patented process and has shared that information with the rest of the members.  Troyer received an email back that LIPA is not responsible for their members and to approach each individually. They invitiation to speak to the members about the Troyer patented process was withdrawn.  These emails were published on the Troyer Metatroy blog.

LIPA Consortium: The LIPA consortium is marketing Troyer’s patented KISS approach (keep it simple: streamline). LIPA is representing that this is a new approach developed by their members, even though corporate in most of these companies have attended the Metatron Laser Projector demonstrations with great interest (Metatron name now changed to Z*Tron Vision: Z*TV). Thank heavens Troyer had savvy mentors who counseled her telling her she did not have to get a NDA (non-disclosure) but always get signatures to document who attended the Metatron private demonstrations and received pripriotiry paper work.  When the LIPA group realizes that IMAX/Kodak/Barco do not have patents to cover dome theater like they represent, there should be an acknowledgement.  Today we have blogs and social media, so blatant infringements by companies in a consortium is not as likely to work. It is in fact the classic example of why innovation is threatened. Why should any of the many watching the Troyer struggle with her patents try to innovate?

Troyer’s Patents:  Troyer’s patents cover these areas: Laser apparatus, projector, camera and projector with full color, high contrast dimensional infinite focus images, Telecine and Digital Intermediate, etc.

Audiences/gamers/consumers want Cinerama auto stereo images (3D with no glasses). Z*Tron Vision (Z*TV) covers laser TV from Pico (small hand held) to large 3D dome theaters.  Digital Cinema projectors use reflective light valve (RLV). Troyer’s patents: lasers are directed to RLV with full spectrum colored dimensional infinite focused images that adjust to any surface (curves—domes). The experts have qualified the Troyer patents as the solution for 3D dome theaters. This is because she has patented the ability for a RLV modulated image to adjust to a dome, simulation, Cinerama, or any other irregular screen. The Troyer claims cover modulating Z depth into laser beams to create real time dimensional images without glasses in curved space. Gamers and consumers call for a Smart TV that can take the Internet streaming and translate to auto dimensional images. The military and government and educational institutions want a more realistic immersive training and simulation. Sensors have evolved with Moore’s law. It is imperative for a security person on command and control on the ground to see vividly the dimensional image translated from the drone camera. It is imperative for the surgeon that is looking at an endoscopic (3D) image to see it clearly. Sensor dimensional captured images are distorted on flat screens.  Z*TV depth dimensional imaging eliminates the flat screen distortion and makes possible true vivid images being seen in real time.

Smart TV (internet TV): next big market after smart phone and tablet. Gamers and consumers call for auto stereo (3D without glasses). Steve Jobs stated he would be delivering dimensional laser TV, but he did not have the patents.  There is a race now to see who delivers the next hot device: Apple TV, Google TV, Microsoft, VIZIO, Samsung, Sony, Dell, etc.  Troyer’s patents represent IF IT IS- infinite focus, instant transformation, and innate sharpness — attributes that deliver the long awaited dimensional TV. Troyer and team are now aligning with experts to help market and negotiate deals with the interested parties.

WHY? The Microvision Pico laser projector infringes Troyer’s patent claims. Intel and Pioneer have recently signed to be OEM and sell Microvision products. Intel states they want to take the Microvision designs to a bigger screen for gamers, home theater, etc. The basic Troyer patented design also works with medical, instrumentation, scientific; signage, 3D dome, and HIVE platforms.

HIVE: Holographic Immersive Virtual Environments

HIVE: Z*Tron Vision (ZTV) is the linchpin for the HIVE. The HIVE is possible because of Z*TV. The images can be projected in 3D curved space.  The HIVE is the next step to the Hologram and to more realistic images.  The HIVE is the Smart TV (Internet TV) that interconnects devices using the current infrastructure. Apple, Google, Microsoft, Vizio, Cisco, Motorola, Dell, etc. are competing to deliver.   Gamers and consumers want auto-dimensional vivid bright images in curved space. They want the HIVE.

Troyer published the patent claim chart on her blog. These are the claims that are being infringed:  https://metatroy.wordpress.com/ 

Under April 17–  Z*Tron Vision IF IT IS about RED Laser Projector

  

  • Lasers addressed to a reflective light valve using full spectrum color (635 nm. red of above).
  • Cyan (near 488 nm.) can be added to make a fuller color spectrum and to reduce speckle.
  • The laser beam is expanded (safer for the eye than a direct laser beam).
  • Laser images retain infinite sharpness (infinite depth of focus) and automatically has the ability to adjust in real time to any irregular surface such as Cinerama or domes or curved simulation screens.
  • Laser attributes retained in the modulated image to the screen: coherence, collimation and polarization for better sharp vivid images and better 3D.
  • Provides better 3D because of the inherent polarized image.  Creates vivid, sharp better 3D images  Because the inherent quality of the beam is kept that is modulated by a reflective light valve, the image has the ability to adjust in real time to any irregular surface such as Cinerama or domes.

Road Map Best Approach and Licensing: Break down the areas of licenses.

It is established that all want displays—vivid, high contrast, sharp details, infinite focus, auto stereo—depth dimension, full color (saturated); ability to adjust in focus to any surface –mostly be in focus on curved surface, without any adjustments.  The Troyer patented process provides IF IT IS:  infinite focus, instant transfer, innate sharpness.

Licensing Area                      In Discussion/ Interest                         Competition Infringement

Pico (vehicle; navigation; etc.)     John Deere                                  Microvision/ Pioneer

Pico                                                                                                                       Axaxtech

Smart TV                             NVidia, Motorola Mobility, Dell         Intel (Microvision design)

Smart TV                             Deluxe, Reliance (India)                               HDI— Red

Medical                               Working with expert                       None—that we have located

Smart Internet TV   Intel, Motorola Mobility, Dell, Sony, Samsung (all are attempting auto stereo) Note: Visio has seen my patented process (but is fast tracking to deliver Google TV with their own method).

Smart TV Approach: One suggested method — Locate strategic vendor parties to demonstrate the most advanced Troyer model; strategic partner is licensee/ manufacturer/ etc. May be the group that tackles other smart TV infringers.

Example of the Troyer Patent Claim Chart  

Troyer Claims                AAXA    Microvision  Light Blue Optics  IMAX/ Barco/Kodak  LIPA Promise  HDI (RED)

Reflective Light Valve (RLV) with laser light (DLP, LCoS, MEMS, LED, etc.)

Full color red >635 nm.        X       X          X           X          X              X

Infinite focus                          X        X          X           X               ? implies infinite focus

Polarized Coherent (3D)      X        X          X           X          X               X

Reflective Light Valve           LCOS     MEMS       LCoS      DLP       DLP and LCoS    LCoS

Expanded Laser Beam          X        X          X           X          X                 ?

Beam directed to RLV          X         X         X            X         X                 X

More Eye Safe: Expanded laser beams are more eye safe than a direct pointed beam. Question: Is LIPA marketing “infinite focus”? Is IMAX? Yes if they have infinite sharp images by keeping the laser’s attributes of polarization and coherence in the expanded laser beam. You cannot deliver good 3D unless you keep the laser beam attributes.  LIPA does not talk about infinite focus. Instead their members state they have the most realistic 3D by using the laser attributes. Kodak’s demonstration was with polarized coherent images for better 3D sharp vivid focused images.—that is Troyer’s patented process with IF IT IS.

Troyer Note:  added after seeing Red Laser Projector at NAB:  HDI has just been added to the list – even though I have followed to see if there are any patents.  I also have followed from beginning since I know Ed Sandberg, who was hired as a person to help set up optics when our lab was at Lexel Lasers in Fremont (Silicon Valley).   Red Laser Projector has hired Ed Sandberg to design their laser projector.  Ed uses LCOS – at least with HDI demonstration. Now RED states they are going to go upgrade to the 4K LCOS method.  They state that this will get rid of their blurriness ( ghosting). Ed states in his resume that he worked with the military laser projectors.  The group he worked with started with a very rudimentary system that was based on the Cavendish patent.  The TRW military laser projector was not based on the system from QD Technology. The QD Technology (Noble, Sandberg, Nelson) was not involved further. TRW, the group holding the contracts, took over from Vizulux and ugraded the projectors so they met the rigid standards for quality images for the contract for the war room walls. When the images passed, the projectors were installed  in the command and control war rooms. It took a technician always on call in each facility. The projectors ran 3 years with a 98% up time that met the stringent qualifications.

Ed Sandberg has followed our progress and knows about my patents and approach.  His partner was one of my main engineers.  Red/ HDI/ Ed Sandberg to not have patents to cover their basic laser projector architecture.  The stereo 3D polarization for stereo images is well known to anyone in the art. It was referred to in my white papers as one possible 3D with glasses appraoch with lasers. The change from 3D stereo with arc lamps (one channel combined stereo or  two channel) is that lasers are naturally polarized.  In my white papers I state strongly that we believe in another approach (also covered under my patents) that is described in http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/metaztron-holographic-z-depth-factor

Patent Charts point out when competitors advertise you patent claims— thus using your patented process.

AAXA:

The AAXA L1 v2 Laser Pico Projector is an updated version of the L1, the world’s first laser powered pocket projector. The updated design improves the performance of L1 v2 by increasing the thermal efficiency of the PCOS laser light engine. The unique three-color laser light source enables the L1 v2 to produce images with amazing color saturation that are always in focus. Designed for mobile professionals and entertainment, the AAXA L1 v2 pocket projector combines a revolutionary laser light source, proprietary despeckling technology, and an LCoS imager (reflective light valve) to achieve a 20 lumen output at 800×600 resolution without the pixilation problems found in some laser projectors.

  • Manufacturer: AAXA Technologies, Inc.
  • Manufacturer Website Address: http://www.aaxatech.com
  • Product Name: L1 v2 LCOS Projector
  • Projection Method: Front
  • Lamp Type: Laser

Microvision: From promotional sheet:

With the MicroVision SHOWWX+™, the world’s first laser projector is now even brighter – our PicoP® display engine allows you to enjoy deep, rich color projection with bright and vivid laser images that are always in focus. Even on curved surfaces. We call this ‘infinite focus’.

SHOWWX+TM Laser Pico Projector Display Performance

Resolution: WVGA (848 x 480)

Brightness: 15 Lumens

Aspect Ratio: 16:9 Widescreen

Focus: No user focus adjustment needed. Image in focus, even on curved surfaces

Refresh Rate: 60 Hz (nominal) (this is a raster scans)

Color Gamut: > 200% NTSC (this means that red is >635 nm. to have full color images)

Contrast Ratio: > 5,000:1 (they are scanning – could not have good contrast with flood)

Throw Ratio: 1:1 (projection distance/image diagonal)

Image size: 150 mm to 2500 mm (6 in to 100 in)

Projection Distance: 150 mm to 2500 mm (6 in to 100 in)

Regulatory: Class 2 laser product.1

Microvision Blog: http://www.microvision.com/displayground/uncategorized/moving-the-bar/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=moving-the-bar

Because our PicoP display engine uses a raster scan method to create a picture pixel by pixel, line by line, it knows at any given time where those pixels are being painted by the engine. This allows us to couple a photo detector with the engine which then can be used to track a reflective surface by tracking the XY coordinate of the light that is reflected back.  

 

Note:  Troyer has patent for laser apparatus with projector and camera (photo detector)—Feb. 14, 2012.

The camera could be a Kinect (Micorsoft).

Microvision projection: you can see the scanning lines in the video images. There is a problem with the scanning design not hitting 60 seconds per cycle as stated (60 htz). The Troyer main priority with the patented process was to design the architecture for a more eye safe model (expanded lines) and to produce good images that when photographed look like film with no visible scan lines or pixels.

Smart Internet TV Summary: Most predictors feel that Smart TV will have certain attributes: dimension real time images without glasses, wide field of view, always in focus images (infinite focus) which means ability to adjust to any curved screen or any other irregular surface automatically.  Pioneer is using the Microvision method in automobiles. Intel has signed to be a partner with Microvision and sell Smart TV based on the design. Intel has decided to use the Troyer patented process for developing Smart TV. In using the Microvision process. Intel is participating in the infringement of the Troyer patents. Intel considered using the Troyer patented method in 2005 when they were attempting to do the LCoS Pico and “suitcase” projector.  The small lasers were not mature enough at that time for that market.

http://www.microvision.com/displayground/tag/pioneer/   Note: Pioneer and Microvision signed a deal to use the Microvision laser light engine in new applications for the automobile: Shares in Redmond-based Microvision (NASDAQ: MVIS) soared more than 12 percent in early Wednesday trading after the deal with the Japanese company was announced, and shares finished up 7 percent, rising 12 cents to close at $1.81. MicroVision and Pioneer signed a memorandum of understanding for future manufacturing and commercial distribution of MicroVision’s PicoP-based display engines.  Microvision Laser Engine: Pioneer uses the Microvision process (Troyer’s patent) for many apps. One is a car application including car window information for the driver.

Microvision History: Microvision’s progress has been interesting. They had scanning goggle patents and then they started designing with my patented claims. It took a few variations for them to figure out that they get a much brighter picture if the laser beam is in sync with the raster scan.  Microvision raster scans on a MEMS reflective light valve so ghosting is not a problem. It is obvious that Light Blue Optics also figured this out that syncing the scanning of the colored laser beams with the written image (LCoS) eliminating the ghosting in fast moving images and created better contrast. Games and sports demand fast response time with their fast movement.  Microvision and Light Blue Optics should have read the 1997 white paper on my web site or studied my patent drawings more carefully. It would have saved on R&D time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UfarRM0BoM

When the Microvision projector is taken apart it is found that there is one scanning line addressed to the MEMS reflective light valve that provides the modulation. The Microvision video was shot in 2008. In 2011 Intel made a deal with Microvision to sell their product and also to use the Microvision architecture for larger images.  This is because laser projection that is designed according to the Troyer patented architecture shows vivid shaper, high contrast images with full color.  Reading script is also more vivid than with other Pico projectors because of the Troyer patented design.

NOTE:  http://www.microvision.com/displayground/tag/pioneer/

It is indicated that Intel has decided to use the Troyer patented process for developing Smart TV. In using the Microvision process Intel is participating in the infringement of the Troyer patents. Intel considered using the Troyer patented method in 2005 when they were attempting to do the LCoS Pico and “suitcase” projector.  The small lasers were not mature enough at that time for that market.

Light Blue Optics

http://www.3i.com/media/press-releases/light-blue-optics-raises-us26-million-to-accelerate-development-of-laser-based-miniature-projection-systems.html

Founded in 2004, LBO has developed an innovative holographic laser projection technology that allows full color, high-quality video images to be projected onto flat or curved surfaces. LBO’s novel approach to projection delivers a unique combination of enabling features including an ultra-wide throw angle, in-built laser speckle reduction, infinite focus, low power consumption, no moving parts and a robust design that naturally lends itself to miniaturization and low cost manufacture.  LBO’s patented holographic laser projection technology delivers full color, high-quality video images that remain in focus at all distances. The technology’s efficiency, small form factor, robustness and cost advantages make it ideally suited for deployment in multiple markets including automotive, digital signage and consumer electronics.

Light Blue Optics is funded by a syndicate of investors including Robert Bosch Venture Capital GmbH, Earlybird Venture Capital, Capital-E, NESTA, Christie Digital Systems Canada Inc., Minaik, WhiteGold Fund Management and DFJ Esprit. It raised $2.5m in 2006, $26m in 2007, $15m in 2009 and another $13m last year – $56.5m in total. On last year’s completion it said the cash raised was designed to realise a growing list of new applications for its Light Touch™ technology.

Note: the CEO and CFO have left Light Blue Optics. They realize that they are infringing on the Troyer patent; they have raised money not having the patents they claimed to cover their process. What I cannot figure out is how the backers can invest such large sums without checking the patent status?

IMAX and KODAK and BARCO    http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1222364361001/imax-ceo-on-laser-projection-patents-deal-with-kodak/

IMAX made the announcement that Barco has been chosen to be the exclusive supplier of both xenon and laser-projectors for IMAX for the next 7 years. According to the announcement, the laser projectors will incorporate technology IMAX has licensed from Kodak. Installations of Barco laser projectors at IMAX venues will begin in 2013.According to Display Daily, Barco demonstrated a laser projector with 55,000 lumens. For comparision: professional Sony SRXR320P Cinema Projector: 21,000 lumens.

http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/IMAX_Licenses_Exclusive_Right_to_Kodak_39_s_Next-Generation_Laser_Projection_Technology.htm

Monday, October 17, 2011

IMAX Licenses Exclusive Right to Kodak’s Next-Generation Laser Projection Technology

Groundbreaking Technology Will Enable IMAX(R) Film-Based Screens Over 80 Feet and Dome Theatres to Deliver the Highest-Quality Digital Content Available for the First Time Ever

This Kodak intellectual property is truly cutting edge, and will be used by IMAX’s esteemed Technology Group to enhance the cinematic experience for consumers, enable the application of digital technology in our larger and institutional theatres, and make being in business with IMAX even easier and more profitable,” said IMAX CEO Richard L. Gelfond.

IMAX expects to introduce the new laser-projection technology by the second half of 2013 and that it will provide the company’s largest screen and dome customers — which have previously only had access to analog film — with a full array of digital content, which often includes Hollywood’s biggest IMAX DMR(R) titles.

“We are delighted to be licensing our technology to a company as innovative as IMAX,” said Kim Snyder, President, Entertainment Imaging, and Vice President, Eastman Kodak Company. “Because this technology produces the deepest blacks, and the brightest 3D of any system demonstrated to date, it will truly make the movies more exciting for consumers, and that creates a strong value proposition for the studios and exhibitors as well. That’s the ultimate measure of this relationship. We look forward to working with the IMAX team to make this vision a reality.”

The Kodak technology is expected to extend these efforts and allow the illumination of IMAX 80-to-100-foot screens and domes with a brightness and clarity not currently attainable in these formats. The solution will also consume less power, last longer and have a wider color gamut when compared with existing technology.

TROYER’S QUESTION: To Kodak’s Kim Snyder and to IMAX CEO Gelfond: Can you please provide the patent numbers for Kodak’s patents that cover big dome screens or Cinerama screens? I have not been able to locate them. Are they patent pending? I have found quite a few patents on the laser projector with grated light valve (GLV) that Kodak stopped using. The grating light valve breaks the coherence and polarization in the modulated laser beam. Thus you do not get good 3D or have the capacity for real time always in focus on curved screens. Also the GLV limits the brightness in the image. It is not light efficient. Sony, Evans & Sutherland and Rockwell Collins have all mothballed a similar light valve device after paying huge licensing fees: Silicon Light Machine: SLM–  Sony: $30 million for entertainment.  Evans & Sutherland: $10 million for domes and planetariums. Rockwell Collins: $72.5 million for simulation. Rockwell also received buildings and other property in the deal.

http://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-48/issue-03/features/lasers-inject-new-life-into-projection-displays.html#.T2PVJDeLTOQ.twitter

Kodak has been granted two leap frog patents, which were applied for after visiting the MetaTron Lab at Lexel Laser in the Silicon Valley in 2000 to see our demonstration (documented). One is to expand the laser beam and address a reflective light valve and reduce speckle with a special Optic.  The other discusses the need for full color spectrum and added cyan but the claims are about modulating and do not cover the basic colors. The modulation layout is very general, listing all the possibilities.

We claim that the Kodak demonstration laser projector model was based on the Troyer patented architecture using the DLP (reflective light valve) and broad spectrum colors— red 635 nm or over. The images would not be full spectrum color if lower red was used. Also Kodak kept the polarization and collimating in the beam to the screen to create 3D images. The switching in polarization 3D is a known art. The various ways of achieving 3D using the attributes of lasers was discussed in the Troyer white papers provided for clients since 2002.

Suggestion:  Set up a forum by those who do not want to wait another 10 years for laser projection? Evidently according to the situation so far LPA will not be holding the forums. Members pay $25,000 to join, so Pete Lude is taking care of his paid members. The forum should discuss what to do when public companies knowingly misrepresent the facts to their stock holders.  IMAX is misrepresenting they have patents to cover big screens and domes and full color bright images—using lasers and a reflective light valve (DLP, LCoS, or other). It can be proven that IMAX is very aware that Troyer has the patents.  Please study the Troyer patent claims to verify Troyer patent coverage.

LIPA Consortiumhttp://www.lipainfo.org/news.html

The main companies in this group have seen the Troyer laser projector demonstrations in her lab or on the IMAX dome:  Kodak, IMAX, Sony, Dolby, NEC, Disney, and THX technology experts. Many others have seen the Metatron demonstration. It can be shown that the LIPA company members who are building laser projectors are very aware of Troyer’s patents. Is this consortium formed to protect them in their plan to infringe on the Troyer patents?  These companies, when attending the MetaZtron demonstrations received white papers and specifications.

LIPA represents that they are making Laser projectors more available to audiences, but LIPA really represents a consortium that is stating they are planning on infringing on the Troyer patent process. If they follow the laser architecture they are advocating which is the most KISS___ keep it simple – streamline (Troyer’s patents).

NOTE:  Troyer has informed LIPA Consortium through Pete Lude (Pete Lude—founder and chairman and with Sony). She has also received a letter back. This has been published on the Troyer blog: MetaTroy: https://metatroy.wordpress.com/

NAB 2012 session on laser TV: http://expo.nabshow.com/mynabshow2012/public/SessionDetails.aspx?FromPage=SessionDetails.aspx&SessionID=1781

Background on Troyer Patents:

https://metatroy.wordpress.com/about

                       

Troyer Patent US 6183092  February 6, 2001

1.    A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; (Full color spectrum with deeper red)
a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image;  Troyer Note: (US patent 2006, 2012 and Canada broaden to reflective light valve with same claims)

further laser apparatus for projecting one or more picture beams that include green and blue laser light; and wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black; wherein the further laser apparatus projects substantially cyan light with the blue and green light;

Troyer  note: (add cyan which has been found to provide better color spectrum and is stated in the DCI—digital cinema initiative for best color balance—Kodak has a leapfrog patent that stressed adding cyan but does not have it in the claims.

wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; and further comprising means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when present in such a picture; said suppressing means comprising the combination of:
means for displacing the beam substantially as a unit, during its projection; said light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer; and said cyan light.  Troyer note:  All laser projectors need to provide full color spectrum for best image.  All the laser projectors that work are using a reflective light valve for modulation.

Troyer note: This claim covers full spectrum color (using deeper red—635 nm. red- than the art was previously).  Also Cyan is added which suggests also using the secondary colors of yellow, magenta, and cyan (488 nm.)  Thus great blacks and whites can be created and speckle is reduced with the broad spectrum colors. Full color spectrum is created with lasers that are addressed to a reflective light valve (RLV). The claim was broadened to all RLV in US 2006 and Canadian patent: notice of allowance Feb. 28, 2011. The art before stated that orange red (610 nm.) had to be used for more brightness and to match the NTSC (TV) analog color chart. This orange red caused more speckle because of the shimmer.  The claim with 635 nm. red or above thus covers full spectrum filmic color with speckle repression with a reflective light valve (RLV). All digital cinema projectors use RLV— DLP, LCoS, LED, MEMS, or any to be invented.

2. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and further laser apparatus for projecting one or more picture beams that include green and blue laser light; wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black; and wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; and further comprising means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when present in such a picture; said suppressing means comprising the combination of: means for displacing the beam substantially as a unit during its projection; and said light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer.  Troyer note: All laser projectors using the reflective light valve infringe on this claim if they have full color spectrum and are using polarized laser images.  The description of means for displacing the beam substantially as a unit during its projection is explained in the patent text to full extend and in the drawings.

3. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and further laser apparatus for projecting one or more picture beams that include green and blue laser light; wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black; and the liquid-crystal light valve is controlled by light generated substantially in response to a type of traditional broadcast video signals; and substantially no color correction or gamma adjustment is applied to remove any color-balance effect of using said 635-nanometer or longer-wavelength laser light instead of broadcast video standard red. Troyer note: All laser projectors using reflective light valve and using full color spectrum 635 nm. red and over — infringe on this claim.

4. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for protecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; and a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; wherein the laser light sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; and further comprising means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when present in such a picture; said suppressing means comprising means for displacing the beam substantially as a unit during its projection.

Troyer note: 1 – 4 patent claims are independent. Troyer and experts claim that the laser projectors being built are infringing on these claims by Microvision, Light Blue Optics, Kodak, IMAX, Barco, Sony, RED.  If the laser image is not delivered as a unit to the screen and is an actual laser beam—then that projector should not have FDA approval because actual individual laser beams out of the lens are dangerous to the eyes.

5. The projector of claim 4, wherein: said suppressing means further comprise said light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer, in combination with the displacing means.

6. The projector of claim 5:  wherein the liquid-crystal light valve has a beam-modulation stage for impressing the desired image onto the beam, and a control stage to control said impressing; and further comprising: means for writing an image incrementally onto successive portions of the control stage;and means for directing the beam onto successive selected portions of the modulation stage, and for generally synchronizing the directing means with the image-writing means. Note: This is the way to do it best—as Microvision as discovered, Light Blue Optics, AXXA, and Kodak discovered with their demonstration laser projector.

7. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for protecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; wherein the liquid-crystal light valve has a beam-modulation stage for impressing the desired image onto the beam, and a control stage to control said impressing; means for writing an image incrementally onto successive portions of the control stage; and means for directing the beam onto successive selected portions of the modulation stage, and for generally synchronizing the directing means with the image-writing means.

Note: The infringers will find if they synchronize the laser expanded beam with the image information that they will get rid of the blurring—ghosting—even with a LCoS or other liquid crystal device. Also the contrast is much higher, because a flood of the laser beam is not bleeding into the black (reduces contrast). The goal is for the best image that looks like film.  Thus no blurring (ghosting), high contrast and full color vivid sharp images.

8. A laser projector for use in forming an image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly different distances from the projectors said projector comprising laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; wherein the liquid-crystal light valve operates by introducing at least partial disruption of the laser-light coherence; and means for projecting the picture beam onto such irregular projection medium to form an image that appears substantially sharp on said portions of distinctly different distances, notwithstanding said at least partial disruption of coherence.

Note:  any laser projector that uses a reflective light valve and lasers and has infinite sharpness and good polarized 3D images uses this method that was discovered by Troyer and patented. Before laser projectors had infinite focus but were using the AOM (acoustic optic modulation) for modulating the image. That was dangerous to the eyes because a flying spot scan was used, directing laser beams out of the lens.  Also the AOM approach, like the grated light valve approach (Kodak) was not light efficient. Brightness was reduced on the screen.

9. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting along a path a picture beam that includes laser light which sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium, said path having an axis; and means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when in such a picture; and the suppressing means comprising means for displacing the axis of the path during projection of the beam.

10. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for protecting along a path a picture beam that includes laser light which sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; means for at least Partly suppressing visible speckle when in such a picture; the suppressing means comprising means for displacing the path during projection of the beam; and a liquid-crystal light valve having a beam-modulation stage for impressing an image onto the beam; and wherein: the displacing means scan the beam over the beam-modulation stage during said projection.

11. The projector of claim 10, wherein: the displacing means comprise an optical deflecting element mounted for mechanical rotation.
12. The projector of claim 11, wherein: the deflecting means comprise an optical deflecting element mounted for mechanical rotation.
13. The projector of claim 12, wherein: the deflecting element comprises a mirror mounted on a galvanometer or motor.
14. The projector of claim 13, wherein: the mirror is mounted for rotation about an axis substantially in a reflective surface of the mirror.

15. The projector of claim 10: the light valve also having a control stage to control said impressing; and further comprising: means for writing an image incrementally onto successive portions of the control stage; and means for controlling the displacing means to direct the beam onto successive selected portions of the modulation stage, and to generally synchronize the beam with the image-writing means.  Note:  broadens the laser address to portions of the modulation stage instead of just scanning.

16. The projector of claim 15, wherein: the control stage is a photosensitive stage that receives an incrementally written optical image. Note: control stage is a camera.

17. The projector of claim 15, wherein: the control stage comprises an electrode matrix that receives incrementally written electrical voltages.

18. The projector of claim 10, for use in forming an image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly different distances from the projector, wherein: the displacing means are substantially nondiffusing; and the liquid-crystal light valve operates by introducing at least partial disruption of the laser-light coherence; and further comprising: means for projecting the picture beam onto such irregular projection medium to form an image that appears substantially sharp on said portions of distinctly different distances, notwithstanding said at least partial disruption of coherence.

19. The projector of claim 9, wherein: the displacing means are substantially lossless, to within one percent of beam intensity.

20. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting along a Path a picture beam that includes laser light which sometimes generates visible speckle when used to form a picture on a projection medium; means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle when in such a picture; the suppressing means comprising means for displacing the path during projection of the beam; and beam-expansion means; and wherein the displacing means and beam-expansion means cooperate to achieve a net gain in light-energy efficiency.

Note: Independent claim: This is a claim that does not state liquid crystal light valve or scanning laser beams.  This claim explains how eye safety and light efficiency (brightness) is kept by using beam expansion. All mentioned laser projectors use beam expansion, including the parallel flood approach that the LIPA Consortium (Sony, IMAX, NEC, Barco, Christies etc.) is suggesting is the best approach.

21. The projector of claim 20, wherein: the gain in efficiency approaches approximately fifty-six percent, in comparison with masking off original circular edges of the laser beam.

22. The projector of claim 20, wherein: projection-surface aspect ratio of four to three, the gain in efficiency is approximately sixty-four percent, compared to masking off original circular beam edges.

23. The projector of claim 20, wherein: for a projection-surface aspect ratio of sixteen to nine, the gain in efficiency approaches approximately eighty-five percent, in comparison with masking off original circular edges of the laser beam.
24. The projector of claim 20, wherein: the displacing means and beam-expansion means also cooperate to substantially eliminate initial nonuniformity of brightness in the beam.

25. The projector of claim 9, wherein: the laser apparatus comprises one or more lasers; and every laser in the laser apparatus is exclusively a solid-state laser.

26. The projector of claim 9, wherein: said projection medium has a shape; the laser apparatus comprises optical means for shaping the picture beam to a cross-sectional shape shallower than the shape of said projection medium; and the displacing means also shift the picture beam on the projection medium, during said projection.

27. The projector of claim 26, wherein the optical means are selected from the group consisting of:
plural lenses in series for adjusting the beam dimension in two substantially perpendicular directions; and a curved mirror that forms part of the displacing means.

28. The projector of claim 26, further comprising: a liquid-crystal light valve having a beam-modulation stage for impressing an image onto the beam, said modulation stage having a cross-sectional shape; and wherein: the displacing means comprise a curved mirror that shapes the picture beam to a cross-sectional shape shallower than the cross-sectional shape of said modulation stage; and said curved mirror is mounted in a galvanometer movement or motor, to scan the shaped beam over said modulation stage.

29. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for forming a picture beam that includes laser light;
said laser apparatus producing an initially substantially circular laser-light beam subject to nonuniform illumination; means for transmitting a beam out of the projector for viewing by an audience as images on a substantiallyrectangular viewing screen that has a shape; and means for forming an illuminated image on the substantially rectangular viewing screen by using the circular laser-light beam without masking off significant fractions of the laser-light beam; said illuminated-image-forming means comprising: means for reshaping the initially circular laser-light beam to a laser-light beam of shallower shape than said shape of the substantially rectangular viewing screen, and means for scanning the reshaped laser-light beam over the screen.

30. The projector of claim 29, further comprising: means for minimizing the influence of nonuniformity of illumination in the initially substantially circular laser-light beam; said minimizing means comprising said reshaping and scanning means; wherein the reshaping and scanning means cause said nonuniformity to at least partially average out.

31. The projector of claim 29, wherein: the reshaping means introduce additional illumination nonuniformity along the width of the shallow, wide laser-light beam; and the illuminated-image-forming means further comprise means for compensating for the additional illumination nonuniformity.

32. A laser projection system for forming an image on an irregular Projection medium having portions at distinctly differing distances from the projector; said system comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes laser light; a liquid-crystal light valve for impressing an image onto the beam; and means for projecting the beam from the light valve, with said impressed image, onto such irregular projection medium; wherein the liquid-crystal light valve operates by partial disruption of laser-light coherence in the beam; and further comprising means for, notwithstanding said partial disruption of coherence, causing image to appear sharp on said projection-medium portions of differing distances.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein: the image appears substantially evenly illuminated, except where light is distributed over a receding surface.

34. A laser projection system for forming an image on an irregular projection medium which comprises a curved screen or dome having an image-receiving area that has a shape and that has portions at distinctly differing distances from the projector; said system comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes laser light; a liquid-crystal light valve for impressing an image onto the beam; and means for projecting the beam from the light valve, with said impressed image, onto such irregular projection medium; and wherein the laser apparatus comprises means for shaping the beam to have a cross-sectional shape shallower than the shape of such image-receiving area, and means for scanning the beam on such irregular projection medium; and the beam at such irregular projection medium is substantially uniform in distribution across its cross-section.

 

Note:  Light Blue Optics and AXXA use liquid crystal light valve. Microvision uses a MEMS reflective light valve.  Kodak/ IMAX and Barco use the DLP (MEMS) reflective light valve.  They are attempting to do a parallel projection method—placing all laser diode lines in parallel and sending a flood on the screen. The contrast will be reduced with the parallel static flood approach compared to the scanning or slot approach.  It is almost impossible to keep evenly distributed light over the whole surface of combined parallel lines.  It is not known how effective the  polarization and collimation  combined parallel static image will be for creating non artifact evenly distributed images or for retaining the infinite focus polarized collimated images for best 3D.

Troyer Patent US 6910774    June 28, 2005   

Claims:

These are much the same as the 2001 patent, but it is stated that all the color can be in one light valve or separate. 

1. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength equal to six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; and a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image.

TROYER NOTE: the June 6, 2006 patent claims (divisional) and Canadian patent claims (Feb. 29, 2011) broaden the patent claims to reflective light valve (RLV) any including LCOS, DLP. MEMS, LED, OLED or any to be invented.  This patent claim does not use scanning as a solution.  It is kept open for any laser beam address.

2. The projector of claim 1, wherein: light that appears red in the beam comprises substantially only said laser light of wavelength equal to 635 nanometers or longer.

3. The projector of claim 2, further comprising: means for also incorporating blue and green laser light into the picture beam; and separate, additional reflective liquid-crystal light valves for modulating the blue and green light respectively.

4. The projector of claim 2, wherein: said light valve also receives blue and green laser light for modulation, within the same light valve.

5. The projector of claim 2, further comprising: means for scanning the beam across a face of the light valve during projection of each image, rather than flooding the entire face substantially simultaneously.

6. The projector of claim 5, further comprising: means for also incorporating blue and green laser light into the picture beam; and separate, additional reflective liquid-crystal light valves for modulating the blue and green light respectively.

7. The projector of claim 2, wherein: said light valve also receives blue and green laser light for modulation, within the same light valve.

8. The projector of claim 5, wherein: the laser apparatus comprises no solid-state lasers, but rather exclusively lasers of gas type.

9. The projector of claim 2, wherein: the laser apparatus comprises no solid-state lasers, but rather exclusively lasers of gas type.

10. The projector of claim 1, further comprising: further laser apparatus for projecting one or more beams that include green and blue laser light; and wherein the laser light of wavelength equal to 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black.

11. The projector of claim 10, further comprising: means for receiving high-bandwidth red, green and blue computer-monitor signals from a computer; wherein the projector serves as a high-color-fidelity computer monitor.

12. The projector of claim 10, wherein: the liquid-crystal light valve is not controlled by light derived from traditional broadcast video signals.

13. The projector of claim 12, wherein the liquid-crystal light valve is controlled by light or control signals applied to the valve by writing onto a control stage of the valve: a vector, bitmap or other computer file scanned from an image or generated in a computer, or amplitude-modulated laser-diode illuminationswept dimensionally across the control stage, or images from a small transmissive liquid-crystal display modulator, in turn written by signals not derived from traditional broadcast video signals, or other entire frames without interlace, or motion-picture film color separations, or a still image from a slide or overhead-projection transparency, or a color separation made therefrom, or a live image optically coupled, without electronic intermediary, to the control stage.

14. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; and a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and wherein: light that appears red in the beam comprises substantially only said laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer: the laser apparatus comprises solid-state lasers; and said apparatus projects a beam in which light that appears red is of wavelength between about 635 and 650 nanometers.

15. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; and a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and wherein: said apparatus projects a beam in which light that appears red is of wavelength substantially 647 nanometers.

16. The projector of claim 15, wherein: the image is a moving picture.

17. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and further laser apparatus for projecting one or more beams that include green and blue laser light; wherein the laser light of wavelength about 635 nanometers or longer mixes with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors including pure white and pure black; and the further laser apparatus projects substantially cyan native laser light with the blue or green light, or both.

18. The projector of claim 10, wherein: the first-mentioned laser apparatus and the further laser apparatus, considered together, comprise one or more lasers; and every laser in the first-mentioned laser apparatus and the further laser apparatus is exclusively a solid-state laser.

19. The projector of claim 10, wherein: the first-mentioned laser apparatus and the further laser apparatus, considered together, comprise one or more lasers; and every laser in the first-mentioned laser apparatus and the further laser apparatus is exclusively a gas laser.

20. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image; and further laser apparatus for projecting one or more picture beams that include green and blue laser light; wherein the proportions of light power of the about 635-nanometers or longer-wavelength laser light, the green laser light and the blue laser light are roughly eight to six to five (8:6:5).

21. The projector of claim 10, further comprising: means for also incorporating the blue and green laser light into said picture beam; and separate, additional reflective liquid-crystal light valves for modulating the blue and green light respectively.

22. The projector of claim 10, wherein: said light valve also receives the blue and green laser light for modulation, within the same light valve.

23. A laser projection system for forming a sharp image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly differing distances from the projector; said system comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes laser light; a liquid-crystal light valve for impressing a sharp image onto the beam; and means for projecting the beam from the light valve, with said impressed image being displayed sharply on substantially all such portions, at distinctly different distances, of such irregular projection medium as a show for an audience.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein: the irregular projection medium comprises one or more projection media selected from the group consisting of: an interior of a dome, or other building having internal surfaces that are not generally normal to a projection direction, an exterior of a dome, sculpture, monument, or other structure having external surfaces that are not generally normal to a projection direction, a waterfall, a water fountain, fog or a cloud, ice, a scrim in front of a curtain or screen, a plurality of scrims in optical series, one or more trees, grass, vines or other foliage, a hillside or other landscape, or other receding surface, and an array of people or other animals or other discrete objects, or combinations thereof, at diverse distances from the projecting means; and the projecting means display a protracted show on the one or more projection media, for the audience.

25. The system of claim 24, further comprising: such irregular projection medium.

26. The system of claim 23, further comprising: such irregular projection medium.

27. The system of claim 23, wherein: the laser apparatus comprises one or more lasers; and every laser in the laser apparatus is exclusively a solid-state laser.

28. The projector of claim 24: wherein the laser apparatus projects red laser light in the picture beam; and the light valve impresses red components of an image onto the red laser light; and further comprising: means for also incorporating blue and green laser light into the picture beam, and separate, additional liquid-crystal light valves for respectively impressing blue and green components of the image onto the blue and green light.

29. The projector of claim 24, wherein: said light valve receives laser light components of three respective colors and impresses corresponding color components of the image onto the three respective light components, respectively, all within the same light valve.

30. A laser projection system for forming an image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly differing distances from the projector; said system comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes laser light; a liquid-crystal light valve for impressing an image onto the beam; and means for projecting the beam from the light valve, with said impressed image, onto such irregular projection medium to form a substantially sharp image on such medium at such distinctly differing distances.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein: the irregular projection medium comprises one or more projection media selected from the group consisting of: an interior of a dome, or other building having internal surfaces that are not generally normal to a projection direction, an exterior of a dome, sculpture, monument, or other structure having external surfaces that are not generally normal to a projection direction, a waterfall, a water fountain, fog or a cloud, ice, a scrim in front of a curtain or screen, a plurality of scrims in optical series, one or more trees, grass, vines or other foliage, a hillside or other landscape, or other receding surface, and an array of people or other animals or other discrete objects, or combinations thereof, at diverse distances from the projecting means; and the projection means form the substantially sharp image on substantially each element of the selected one or more media.

32. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes visible laser light of wavelength longer than 640 nanometers; and a reflective liquid-crystal light valve for modulating the beam with a desired image.

33. The projector of claim 32, wherein: said apparatus projects a beam of wavelength substantially 647 nanometers.

34. The projector of claim 32: wherein the light valve impresses red components of an image onto the laser light of wavelength longer than 640 nanometers; and further comprising: means for also incorporating blue and green laser light into the picture beam, and separate, additional liquid-crystal light valves for respectively impressing blue and green components of the image onto the blue and green light.

35. The projector of claim 32, wherein: said light valve receives laser light components of three respective colors and impresses corresponding color components of the image onto the three respective light components, respectively, all within the same light valve.

Troyer   Patent June 6, 2006 US 7055957This patent   can be licensed separately.  The claims   broadens to all reflective light valves

have the broader view with

 valve—which includes all RLV – LCoS, DLP,   MEMS, LED, etc.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7055957.html

http://www.google.com/patents/US7055957

Inventor: Troyer
Date Issued: June 6, 2006
Application: 10/946,081
Filed: September 21, 2004
Inventors: Troyer; Diane (Kalona, IA)
Assignee:
Primary Examiner: Dowling; William C.
Assistant Examiner:
Attorney Or Agent: Carter; Ryan N.
U.S. Class: 349/25;   349/5; 353/31;   359/197
Field Of Search: 353/31;   353/33; 353/34;   353/37; 353/122; 359/197; 359/212; 359/215; 359/216; 359/221; 359/223; 348/751; 348/761; 348/766; 349/2;   349/4; 349/25;   349/5
International Class: G03B 21/14

Claim:

1. A laser projector comprising: laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam that includes exclusively laser light of wavelength about six hundred thirty-five (635) nanometers or longer; a reflective light valve having a beam-modulation stage for impressing an image onto the exclusively laser-light beam, and having a control stage, distinct from the beam-modulation stage, to control said impressing; means for writing an image incrementally onto successive generally slot-shaped portions of the control stage; and means for directing the exclusively laser-light beam onto successive selected generally slot-shaped portions of the modulation stage, and for generally synchronizing the exclusively laser-light beam with the image-writing means;wherein the laser apparatus initially projects the exclusively laser-light picture beam having substantially all rays substantially parallel to a common optical axis, with substantially no ray crossing the optical axis or otherwise passing through the center of any aperture stop; wherein the projector therefore has no telecentric zone; and the exclusively laser-light picture beam is not focused at or near the directing means or the modulation stage, or elsewhere within the laser projector.

2. The projector of claim 1, wherein: the reflective light valve includes a substantially distinct spatial portion for modulation of each distinct spatial portion of the exclusively laser-light beam, respectively.

3. The projector of claim 2, wherein: the projected beam has a cross-section that is substantially uniform in intensity rather than having a Gaussian intensity distribution.

4. The projector of claim 3, wherein: substantially the entire cross-section of the exclusively laser-light beam, with negligible masking, is directed onto said successive selected portions of modulation stage.

5. The projector of claim 1, wherein: substantially each control-stage portion has a substantially corresponding modulation-stage portion; and the directing-and-synchronizing means generally synchronize selection of modulation-stage portions with writing at corresponding successive control-stage portions, subject to a delay generally equal to rise time in the modulation stage.

6. The projector of claim 1, wherein: the directing means comprise a curved mirror that shapes the picture beam to a shallow cross-section; and said curved mirror is mounted in a galvanometer movement or motor, to scan the shaped beam across said modulation stage.

7. The projector of claim 1, wherein: the directing means comprise a curved mirror that shapes the picture beam to a shallow cross-section; and said curved mirror is mounted to a rotating disc for scanning the shaped beam across said modulation stage.

8. The projector of claim 1, further comprising: means for reflecting the beam from the directing means into the beam-modulation stage and for transmitting the beam, after return from the beam-modulation stage, to form a picture on a projection medium; and wherein: the laser apparatus is generally disposed on a first level; the light valve, writing means, and reflecting-and-transmitting means are generally disposed on a second level above or below the first level; and the directing means also transfer the beam from the first level to the second level.

9. The projector of claim 8, wherein: the directing means turn the beam from a path generally associated with the first level to propagate in a direction generally perpendicular to that path, toward the second level.

10. The laser projector of claim 1 wherein the laser light is a substantially white laser beam comprised of amplitude-modulated color imaging information; wherein the substantially white laser light is formed by the combination of a red laser beam having a laser light of wavelength of about 635 nanometers or longer, and laser beam of blue and green wavelengths so that the white light contains a full color spectrum.

11. The laser projector of claim 10 wherein the substantially white laser light further comprises at least one additional laser beam; said additional laser beam having a wavelength of about 488 nanometers

 

Troyer Note: This claim suggests that the secondary colors are included with the red, blue and green. Secondary colors are yellow, magenta, and cyan (488 nm).

12. The projector of claim 1, further comprising: means for reflecting the laser light beam from the directing means into the beam-modulation stage and for transmitting the beam, after return from the beam-modulation stage; means to form a sharp in focus picture on an irregular projection medium;; wherein the laser apparatus is generally disposed on a first level and the light valve, writing means, and reflecting-and-transmitting means are generally disposed on a second level.   

 

Troyer Note: means dome, simulation, curved screen or irregular screen like water screen, balloon, sculpture having portions at distinctly different distances from the projector

13. The projector of claim 1, further comprising: means for reflecting the beam from the directing means into the beam-modulation stage and for transmitting the beam after return from the beam-modulation stage, means to form a sharp in focus picture on an irregular projection medium; having portions at distinctly different distances from the projector; and wherein the laser apparatus generally retains the collimation and the spatial modulation is preserved in the propagating laser beam.

Troyer Note: This is the magic that makes possible always in focus sharp images on domes and with simulation—also this makes possible the 2D to 3D in the fact that the sharp spatially modulated images that are always in focus create automatic depth in curved space or with volume flat screens.


14. The laser projector of claim 1, further comprising a means of preserving the pseudo collimation (non-crossing rays) of the laser beams to form a sharp image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly differing distance from the laser apparatus. Troyer Note: Dome half screen, Cinerama, Simulation, CAVE/ HIVE—holographic immersive virtual environments.

 

Troyer US Patent February 14, 2012 8113660

Projector and Camera with Dimensional Sharp Full Spectrum Color Dimensional Images

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Applicant:                           Diane Troyer

Invention:                          Laser Projection Apparatus with LIQUID-CRYSTAL LIGHT VALVES

AND SCANNING READING BEAM

February 14, 2012

Serial No:                           8113660

Filed:                                   04/20/2006

Group Art Unit: 2878

Examiner:                           WILLIAM C. DOWLING

               Claims
  1. A laser apparatus (projector) comprising:

a camera having an image sensor for gathering an image;

a laser modulator for receiving a signal from the image sensor then projecting the

image as a picture beam, wherein the beam that is projected includes visible laser light

having a wavelength of 635 nanometers red or longer;

a reflective light valve for modulating the beam; and

means for addressing the laser beam on the face of the light valve during projection

of said desired image;

wherein the projector produces collimated spatially modulated laser beams that

produce sharp images with depth.

2.   The laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the camera has a means for providing depth enhancement scalability and means

to separate the visible light into red, green and blue color information.

  1. The laser apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:

means for incorporating blue and green laser light into the picture beam and separate

additional reflective light valves for modulating the blue and green light

respectively.

  1. The laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

said reflective light valve also receives blue and green laser light for modulation.

  1. The laser apparatus for claim 1, wherein said reflective light valve is a liquid-crystal reflective light valve.
  1. The 1aser apparatus for claim 1, wherein:

the beams also include green and blue laser light and

wherein the laser light of wavelength equal to 635 nanometers or longer mixes

with the green and blue laser light to provide substantially pure neutral colors

including pure white and pure black.

  1.  The laser apparatus for claim 6, wherein:

the laser projector is adapted to project substantially

cyan colored light with the blue light and the green light.

  1.  The 1aser apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the laser projector projects purple, magenta, and deep honey.

  1. The laser apparatus of claim 8, wherein:

collimation is retained in the laser beams, thus the spatial modulation is

preserved in the propagating laser beam producing infinite sharp dimensional colored

images.

  1.  The1aser apparatus of claim 9, further comprising:

means for at least partly suppressing visible speckle in a picture formed by said

laser light on a projection medium.

  1. The1aser apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:

means for providing sharp high-bandwidth depth red,

green and blue computer-monitor signals from a computer;

wherein the projector serves as a high-color-fidelity computer monitor.

  1.  The1aser apparatus of claim 1 wherein:

the reflective light valve is controlled by light and control signals applied to the

reflective light valve from the camera captured images

wherein the reflective light valve is controlled by light and control signals from

film, slide images. transparencies. electronically based media and video, direct live

images, LCOS, OLED, DLP, and LED.

  1.  The1aser apparatus of claim 1, wherein the

reflective light valve is controlled by light and control signals of a multi-phase or multi-field imaging         system.

  1.  The laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein the

reflective light valve is controlled by light and control signals from camera capture of a live image of      a stage  performer and is amplified on a big screen.

  1.  The laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein the

reflective light valve is controlled by signals from a live image or hologram optically

coupled, without electronic intermediary.

  1.   A laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein the reflective light valve is controlled by signals sent from one     or more of the following devices: microscope, telescope, MRI, endoscope.
  1.  The laser apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the light valve has a beam-modulation stage for impressing the desired image

onto the beam, and a control stage to control said impressing; and

the projector further comprises:

means for writing an image incrementally onto successive portions of the

control stage; and

means for directing the beam onto successive selected portions of the

modulation stage, and means for generally synchronizing the directing

means with the image-writing means.

  1.  The laser apparatus of claim 1, for wherein:

forming an image on an irregular projection medium having portions at distinctly

different distances from the projector wherein:

the light valve operates by introducing

at least partial disruption of the laser light coherence; and comprising

means for amplifying the camera picture onto such irregular projection

medium to form a dimensional image that appears substantially sharp on said portions

of distinctly different distances.

  1. The laser  apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the beam delivers  full spectrum colored dimension

images that amplify and correlate to the camera information,

and form moving pictures that automatically adjust to a shaped screen.

 

  1.  A laser projector system for forming amplified enhanced imagines with infinite sharp depth for laser

projection in curved space, said system comprising:

a camera having image enhancement capabilities;

a laser projector in communication with the camera for projecting a

spatial modulated full color picture beam that includes laser light;

the laser projector having a reflective light valve for impressing a sharp

image onto the beam; means for directing the beam to the face of the light valve during

projection of a spatial modulated picture beam.

  1.  A laser projector system of 20, wherein the laser projector is adapted to project the spatial modulated  full color dimensional picture beam on convex or concave screens and CAVE;

at diverse distances from the projecting means; and the projecting means

displays a protracted show with sharp dimensional images on the one or more

projection media including interior or exterior staging scrims for opera, performance, TV stages,

CAVE, HIVE- holographic immersive virtual environments

  1.  The laser projector system of claim 20 wherein: the image is delivered to the camera    through optically  switched images or optically multi-dimensional imaging.
  1.  The laser projector system of claim 20 wherein: the camera is adapted to receive images from a  microscope,

telescope, endoscope, MIR, testing instrument.

  1.  The laser projector system of claim 20 wherein a direct image is transmitted to the laser projector by CID, CCD, MEMS, LED, DLP, LCOS, OLED,  or other device that provides  imaging information.
  1.  A laser projector comprising:

a laser apparatus for projecting a picture beam;

a reflective light valve having a camera control stage that is addressed by low

power amplified-modulated lasers;

means to scan modulated lasers with multiple axis;

said laser projector has a beam- modulation stage for imprinting images onto

colored lasers, the laser color including having a wavelength of 635 nanometers or longer;

means to scan the colored beams retaining the infinite depth of sharpness of the

projected image;

wherein the laser beams are substantially parallel rays, and retain the inherent

polarization and collimation of the laser beam.

  1.  The laser projector of claim 25 further comprising means for scanning

collimated reading beams in sync with the writing information.

  1.  The laser projector of claim 25 having increased resolution:

wherein the reflective light valve has a writing control stage;

means to deliver multiple imaging defining devices; and

mean for combining the imaging defining devices to deliver imaging  information.

Troyer Canadian Patent 2,372, 833 given allowance Feb. 28, 2011

Troyer Note: Canadian Application 2,372,833 given notice of allowance. The Canadian patent office is very thorough – and looks at all prior art. This is strong validation of the India and Mexican patents and also the 4 USA patents.  Canada claims are broad covering all reflective light valves.  This patent claims reflective light valves and pretty much uses a combination of claims in the USA patents.

Presented by Diane Troyer;  818-795-2407 (mobile);  319-512-1009 (office)

Metatronvision@gmail.com   Twitter and blog:  metatroy

April 27, 2012

Email to LIPA Lude Troyer Laser ZTV 412

Filed under: Laser Video Projector — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — metatroy @ 6:42 pm

Z*Tron Vision

PETE LUDE Memo – President/CEO of LIPA Consortium  (Feb. 2012)

Note: Lude is Chairman at LIPA – Laser Illuminated Projector Association

Lude: President at SMPTE and Senior VP at Sony Electronics

Pete,

Thank you so very much for the conversation about laser projection and my patents. Congratulations on setting up LIPA laser projector consortium. Thank you for caring about laser projectors and attempting to push the envelope.

Where and how do you suggest we share with the industry the Meta Z*tron Vision (MZTV) laser projector process? Also explaining why the Troyer patented process works best, ascertained after much research and demonstrating prototypes for expert evaluators, many in the studios including your Sony head of entertainment, Chris Cookson when he was at Warner (2002). What do you as the LIPA chairman feel is a way to fast track this process and so the industry finally has been delivered the KISS (keep it simple streamlined) way of presenting the best image (dimensional)? Where did you suggest I present MZTV —what forum?  Are there any other suggestions that you have for introducing Meta Z*tron Vision again?

I did not know that IMAX had made a deal with BARCO when I talked to you– or we would have discussed that further. I did share with you that according to research done by a hired expert in evaluating the Kodak patents (I was asked to provide support by reading the Kodak patents and claims). Kodak does not have patents on big screen domes.  The patents for laser projectors that produce full spectrum colored images that adjust automatically to curved space surfaces are the Troyer patents.

As I explained the Kodak IP attorneys warned their representatives during their Kodak laser projector prototype demonstrations that they should not state that they had patent coverage for their prototype nor should they suggest they are licensing the model they were demonstrating (prototype design). Kodak attorneys are quite aware of patent law and lawsuits and licensing. Kodak litigated against Apple and Rim for infringement on their camera and phone patents. Concerning laser projection, Kodak has a patent portfolio on a grated light valve method. Grated Light Valves have been found not to be an effective way of delivering laser light to the screen.

The Troyer patents are on a reflective light valve that is much more efficient. The Troyer 2001 patent claims liquid crystal light valve. The US 2006 and 2012 patent and the Canadian patent broadened to reflective light valve, counting DLP, LCoS, MEMS, etc. The Kodak demonstration laser projector used the Troyer patented approach with reflective light valves. The Kodak demonstration model used a DLP reflective light valve that is covered by the Troyer patents. This is explained in the Troyer Patent Portfolio  Troyer Patent Portfolio see new patent claims Feb. 14, 2012 Projector Camera full spectrum dimensional (3D) images

In research of statements, literature, press releases, interviews and talking to those who attended the private demonstrations, Kodak representative followed this mandate. Kodak did not suggest that they had patents covering their demonstration model, nor did they state they were selling licenses to their demonstration projector.  They said they were selling their optic designs for the laser projector.  Yes, Kodak has patents on certain adjustments to the basic laser projector optic layouts, such as explained in the Troyer patent description and drawings. Kodak has patents on an optic they add, which they state reduces the speckle in the optic path. It is not known if that optic was part of their optical design in the demonstration model. That optic patent does not in any way reduce the fact that the basic laser projector architecture that LIPA consortium is now suggesting to be used by the industry to assemble laser projectors is the Troyer patented process.

In early 2012 IMAX stated in press releases and interviews that they are finally going to deliver big dome and flat screen laser images. IMAX states they are licensing the Kodak patents that cover big dome and flat screen theaters.   IMAX CEO evidently is attempting to control the laser projector industry and he also wants to obtain higher stock prices.

To save great time and expense, some responsible entity should ask the IMAX CEO or Kodak IP representative what patents IMAX has licensed that cover big dome or flat screens? For that matter, now that IMAX is partnering with Barco, Barco better have the answers or they are putting themselves in the path of infringement if they use the KISS approach for best image. Should LIPA non-profit consortium have this responsibility for the industry? Should we have our representative bring this situation up with LIPA? It would be wonderful if the industry does not have to go through another ten years waiting for great 3D images with bright filmic colors.

It can be shown through the long history between IMAX and Troyer that IMAX corporate is very aware of the Troyer patents and has attended demonstrations of prototypes on domes, etc. It is thus assumed that the IMAX CEO is very aware of the Troyer patented laser projector. In fact it can be shown through documented evidence that IMAX corporate with strategic collusion companies has made a calculated effort to thwart Metatron Inc., Metatron Zone Management and Troyer from delivering the Troyer patented projectors to clients. It is assumed that IMAX and collusion companies have stopped Troyer in introducing her patented laser projection technology in order to keep the IMAX stock from crashing. .

Imax Press Conference Jan. 2012 is reminiscent of press conference May 2003: The IMAX CEO, James Cameron and Phillip Anschutz gave a press conference in May 2003 stating that IMAX was ready to deliver and install video cinema projectors (laser) in IMAX screens (flat screens and domes).  The IMAX stock shot up and the Wasserstein Limited Partners sold their preferred stock for over $800 million.

Is it legal to provide misinformation to stock holders?  Was it legal in 2003 for the IMAX CEO to represent they had digital projectors for flat screens and domes? Is it legal today to state they have patent coverage for domes, when they know they do not?

Did IMAX corporate represent to Cameron and Anschutz that they had finally gotten control of the Metatron technology? This was soon after the 10 assembled JVC projectors for waiting clients who wanted laser projectors were stolen. Among the clients: Famous Players for 8 Canadian large screen theaters, 40 theaters owned by European  sister theater company– Universal Vivendi, Raytheon (Williams Air Force Base—simulation), Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish; etc. Lexel Laser had the 30 lasers assembled for the ten projectors. The theft of the JVC projector bases ruined Lexel Lasers. They were taken over for pennies on the dollar.

Patents protected Troyer from complete demise. Troyer will preach the importance of patents and the patent developer/ inventor receiving fair return for the years of time and expense.  The Troyer patents and the ultimate survival from the Zuddites (modern Luddites) attack on Troyer is an example of how patents can protect a technology and the inventor.

Respectfully,

Diane Troyer

Troyer Note:

Peter Lude had asked me to talk to the LIPA group in our phone conversation prior to this letter. After he got this email (letter), I received the email below.

This is a copy of a section from the LIPA Consortium pamphlet.

  • Communications: chaired by Rich Reames of Sony – Responsible for LIPA’s internals and external communications and outreach
  • Regulatory Technology Issues: chaired by Dave Schnuelle of Dolby – Responsible for identifying and resolving technical issues impeding commercialization of laser illuminated projectors
  • Regulatory Business Issues: chaired by Pete Lude of Sony – responsible for identifying and resolving business issues and ensuring the overall industry’s path to commercialization of laser illuminated projectors

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Michael Ciesinski <michael.ciesinski@flextech.org>

Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:22 PM

Subject: E-mail and Memo to P. Lude/LIPA

To: metatronvision@gmail.com

Cc: “Lude, Peter” <Peter.Lude@am.sony.com>

Ms. Diane Troyer

Metatron Zone LLC

Dear Ms. Troyer:

Peter Lude of Sony forwarded to me your e-mail dated February 14, 2012 concerning the Troyer patent portfolio.  We at the Laser Illuminated Projector Association (LIPA) thank you for your interest in our organization.

However, LIPA is a not-for-profit organization which is not authorized to engage in market promotional activities for any single party, nor is it authorized to consider the patent positions of our members or others in the industry. These activities are simply outside of our charter.

If you wish to present your views on your patent portfolio, you can contact LIPA members directly. However, please be advised that LIPA will have no ability to act on any of the issues which concern your patent portfolio.

I regret that we could not be of assistance to you in this matter.

Sincerely,

Michael Ciesinski

LIPA Managing Director

CEO/ FlexTech Alliance

3081 Zanker Road

San Jose, California USA 95134

Tel. 1-408-577-1300

www.flextech.org

This e-mail message is confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It is not to be forwarded without permission of the sender. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer or mobile device.

Troyer Journal Notes at NAB:   

It seems that my letter to LIPA had a great effect. I ran into David Schnuelle from Dolby in front of the RED Laser Projector booth. He is now a LIPA board member; He saw the MetaZtron projector at IVC lab (International Video Convergence) in Burbank in 2002. I asked him if he remembered?  He looked at me shocked, because maybe he did not make the connection – but what other woman has been shouting laser video projector for years?  Yes, he was with Ken Holland, owner of IVC, when Holland stood at our lab door at IVC screaming at me and my engineer — “You will not get by with this!”  We were getting the laser projector demonstration set up for Warner group (Chris Cookson a member of the Warner group attending).

The IVC post house was the Warner lab for transferring Warner film to DVD.  Ken Holland’s main income was the color lab, where they pushed digital color so the digital cinema arc lamp presentations would be more like film. For the first time, the viewers realized that it was possible for a digital image to have the filmic full color spectrum and good blacks (contrast) –without the need of a color lab to enhance the digital colors.

Ken Holland was a part of the collusion group who made sure that the Troyer patented projector did not make it to the clients, including the Griffith Park Planetarium for their refurbish.  The demonstration laser projector disappeared from the IVC lab with the lasers, tools and 40 expensive custom made polarizing cubes ($600 each) coded for red, green, and blue that were to go into the 10 JVC projector bases being built for clients. IVC was the old Lockheed Skunk Works- so was probably the most secure building in Burbank so all knew it was an inside job. A Burbank police report was made about the stolen projector.

Carmel Development  CEO, Alan Williams, had offered to pay for the lease at IVC. Carmel Development paid for a year in advance. Clint Eastwood was working with Warner then. Carmel Development and Clint Eastwood did not have any ownership in the equipment or patents (documents on request).

NAB: Dave Schnuelle was the LIPA person who was the communicator —whether he wanted to be or not.  He informed me he had read the letter sent to Lude.  He told me that they had decided that they are not infringing because they are flooding the reflective light valve instead of scanning.  I told him that my patent claims cover lasers addressed to the light valve and are not limited to scanning.  I did tell him that flooding is not going to work—that there are many problems with flooding.

Parallel Projection:  The laser attributes mean that the beam can be directed coherent, collimated. Ambient light like the sun can be flooded, not directed.  Parallel Projection combines  streams of laser beams. Kodak and Barco have patents based on forms of how to direct laser light to a reflective light valve. The parallel laser lines are combined into a flood.  That might work if the image was not constantly static (too hot).  It is difficult to provide even light flow without artifacts in the images. Also with such a flood the contrast is reduced.

The reflective light valve does not have much surface for high power laser light for a big screen. We have found that the laser light can be directed to a front surface, then redirected to the  reflective light valve.

Barco and Kodak both have leap frog patents for addressing laser light to a Reflective light valve. A leap frog patent adds a specific addition to a patent’s broader claim that has already been issued. Parallel projection is a specific way to address lasers to the reflective light valve. The Troyer patent claims are broad in how the laser is addressed to the light valve.  I suggested that the LIPA group read my claims and patents (Troyer Patent Portfolio). Also I offered to provide the LIPA members a specific claims chart that compare the Troyer patent claims to the Kodak, IMAX, BARCO, Sony and Christies laser projector reflective light valve configurations in their prototypes.

I informed Dave Schnuelle that I am not planning on suing LIPA, but that my representatives are upset that LIPA is made up of companies whose representatives have attended the Z*Tron Vision (Metatron)demonstrations, received white papers, and are now marketing my patented process, stating this is a new approach.  Patents are for the purpose of protecting the inventor who spent the years of R&D and a great deal of money and discovered the innovation.  For instance just the Canadian patent has cost near $40,000—mainly in years of patent fees.

I also shared I had just seen the RED laser projector 3D demonstration and the images had given me a splitting headache. I did not know if I had preprogrammed myself for a headache –but there was an ache right above my eyes behind my forehead.  Maybe it was because I had peered at the images to see if there was blurring in the fast movement. I had just discovered that the person who set the Red laser projector was my former engineer. Thus I know he does not have patents for his designed process:  lasers addressed to a reflective light valve (LCoS) with the red 635 nm. or above.

Snhnuelle is in charge of Dolby’s new technologies. They were showing an auto stereo display that they had developed with Phillips.  Dolby and Sony are both companies that lost a lot of money last year and are reviving under new management.

CONCLUSION: I wrote my blog the next morning at McDonalds and published it.  I figured it was important to let the LIPA group know I was going to be a spokesperson about this.

CASEY STACK: I had exchanged emails with Casey Stack who was to be on the committee for  LIPA and talked at NAB—I realized that he was asking questions to which the LIPA members wanted answers. The asking question and being able to answer was a good method to cut through. Stack was sharing the answers-(I hope) – emails under other cover

IMAX does not have patent coverage for domes from Kodak.

 Troyer Patent Portfolio see new patent claims Feb. 14, 2012 Projector Camera full spectrum dimensional (3D) images

MetaZtron Vision (MZTV): Patented dome (HIVE) — IMAX does not have patent rights

http://www.slideshare.net/metatroy/hive-zelf-holograph-immersive-virtual-laser-meta-ztron-troyer

H the Holographic Z depth factor works with MZTV laser projectorow

Over view of MetaZtron Vision (MZTV) Power point to John Deere

Diane Troyer

Metatron Zone LLC

office: 319-512-1009 Cell: 818-795-2407

metatroy@hotmail.com
metatronvision@gmail.com

Metatroy Diane’s Twitter

Metatroy slide share (check this out)

MetaZtron Vision holographic Z-depth-factor

MetaZtron Vision applicaitonsMZTV arena music tour (Iron Maiden)

MetaZtron Vision Themed Entertainment (see the Sprite)

In order to change something, don’t struggle to change the existing model. Create a new model and make the other one obsolete”. Buckminster Fuller

http://www.laserfocusworld.com/news/2012/02/10/imax-teams-with-barco-to-co-develop-laser-projection-technology.html

Will Laser TV be the new Smart TV? 

Troyer Note: RED Laser Demonstration – 3D at NAB—

It seems that the prototypes being shown (Sony, Kodak, Barco) all need specialized screens.

The RED demonstration made me realize how important it is to share our approach to auto dimension. Z*TV can  be viewed on a basic white screen material like used in motion picture theaters. It is best if the screen is curved for viewing of the real time dimensional images without glasses.   The current infrastructure can be used to deliver the images. No changes need to be made. The reason this auto dimension no glasses approach works compared to other attempts is becauseof the wide viewing angle.  The viewer can see the images from any place in the room. The  images  can be seen from any angle, any seat in the home theater or in the crowed large auditorium.

Laser TV is the new kid on the block— for big domes, digital cinema, and Smart/ Internet/ Google Apple TV.  We call these attributes: IF IT IS.  Infinite Focus; Instant Transformation, and Innate sharpness – the long sought Holy Grail:  any feed transformed to  film like color with  auto dimensional images that can be seen from any place in the room.

NAB 2012: Red Laser Projector & Player

By Scott Wilkinson • Posted: Apr 20, 2012

The most important consumer-related product introduction at NAB was a new projector and source device from Red Digital Cinema, which is best known for its digital-cinema cameras. As its name implies, the REDray Laser Projector uses lasers as its illumination source, and the red, green, and blue lasers are housed in a separate module (the larger box seen directly above the projector in the photo) that connects to the projector itself via fiber optics. Even more interesting, multiple laser modules can be ganged together to produce more light for larger screens, and the lasers are rated to last more than 25,000 hours with virtually no change in color or light output.

What type of imager does it use? Red would not say, but I have it on relatively good authority that it’s LCOS. I did confirm that it’s a dual-imager, polarized-3D engine with 4K resolution, allowing each eye to see 4K simultaneously using passive-polarized glasses. And it can accept frames rates up to 120fps in 2D or 60fps for each eye in 3D—in fact, it’s native refresh rate is 360fps per eye.

Also introduced was the REDray Player (seen on top of and next to the laser module in the photo), a hard-disk-based source device capable of playing 4K 3D material at up to 120fps as well as 7.1 audio from its four HDMI 1.4 outputs. Content is loaded onto the hard disk via gigabit Ethernet, USB, or SD card, and more storage can be added via eSATA.

I was amazed to learn that Red has developed a new codec called RED code RGB that reduces the bandwidth required for 4K delivery to around 20 megabits per second—that’s right, 4K at a data rate lower than Blu-ray! Red claims it is visually indistinguishable from its REDcode Raw codec, which is used for its camera output at more than 400Mbps, but I’ll reserve judgment on that until I can see a direct comparison between the two. The player includes two independent codecs—REDcode RGB and H.264—for backward compatibility. It will also upconvert lower resolutions to 4K.

The player will be available as a standalone unit for—get this—around $1000! The modular projector package will include a version of the player with an HDMI input and additional video processing, and the cost will depend on how many laser modules you want. Most home theaters will need only one, which is said to be sufficient for screens up to 12 feet wide. And the cost of such a system? Hold on to your hat—around $10,000! That’s less than half the price of the Sony VPL-VW1000ES with 4K 3D per eye, and it includes a 4K 3D player!

Of course, the distribution of such content is still a big question mark. At 20Mbps, a 4K movie encoded in REDcode RGB can be effectively delivered online or on a thumb drive, removing the last technological hurdle to 4K distribution. But will the studios actually start releasing such high-res content? Only time will tell, though Red’s proprietary REDpass DRM (digital rights management) might help persuade them it’s safe to do so.

The line to see the REDray demo was easily the longest at the show. Produced by Ridley Scott among others and written and directed by his son Luke Scott, the demo consisted of a short 3D movie entitled Loom, which was shot on Red Epic cameras at 24fps. It’s a dystopian vision of a totalitarian future reminiscent of THX 1138, complete with a computerized counselor. But whereas much of THX 1138 looks very bright with lots of light and white walls, many of the scenes in Loom are very dark with low contrast, making it less than ideal as demo material.

Also, the system was not completely dialed in—we were seeing 2K in each eye, and there was some obvious ghosting because there had been a last-minute switch to a Stewart 5D screen, which required some tweaking—so the demo didn’t look as good as it could have. Still, I hope to visit Red in the near future to learn more about the projector and player, which seem to be game changers in the world of home and commercial cinema.

From an Italian Technology Paper: Reviews on RED laser

“Beyond the ghosting, the thing that struck me immediately is the native contrast ratio, very, very low. The black level is just too high. Also higher than a lower-priced DLP projector. ”

“All in all there’s the projector. It exists and works, but still need significant improvements, not just for the stereo separation that will be resolved with better management of the polarization of the laser beams. The biggest trouble I think about the native contrast ratio that is simply timeless. ”

__________________

But I hope soon to resolve the problems of this RED and maybe reconsider a 3D system alternative to the polarized passive but always, at least save on the glasses

I know nothing …  These are just personal observations. If the world is turning its business primarily on technologies LampLess, it is clear that not all stakeholders will be watching blow of seeing major share of the sector more profitable than our niche. Therefore, it is assumed that we will see some beautiful, beginning with dall’ Infocommm

Not at all, is a problem of polarization of light in systems of RED Sony technology adopted and probably can not use normal screens for 3D … there is only one type of laser projection … but here I leave the floor to experts in optical physics!

Not that it’s a problem of single implementation: if you adopt a 3D system with linear polarization or circular – as did Sony and RED – serves the silver screen regardless of the light source, you can not escape.

Can be used matte screens with 3D systems active, if the arrays are able to work at a sufficient speed (ie, over 144hz): for example Barco demonstrate Wednesday to CinemaCon a DLP projector 4K laser with XpanD, for more projecting material HFR (Native least 48fps for each eye).

Or interference with systems, but it seems that regulate the wavelengths of RGB laser is actually quite complicated (source: Omega Optical, developers of the 3D Panavision).

Commento # 85 di: SydneyBlue120d pubblicato il 20 Aprile 2012, 22:40 Comment # 85 by: SydneyBlue120d published April 20, 2012, 22:40

In reality as we know it was also announced for the Sony compatibility with Panavision 3D system that works with a white screen, but I do not think has been very successful (to put it mildly …)

Commento # 86 di: Rosario pubblicato il 20 Aprile 2012, 23:11 Comment # 86 by: Rosario published April 20, 2012, 23:11

E’ un peccato dover usare la polarizzazione , è come fare un passo in avanti ed uno indietro. It ‘a shame to have to use the polarization, is like taking a step forward and one step back.

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=fr&sl=it&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avmagazine.it%2Farticoli%2Fvideoproiettori%2F623%2Fanteprima-redray-laser-4k_index.html

 

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.